The Tide Is Turning: Huckabee Surges

Once only considered a contender in Iowa, Mike Huckabee is now in second place nationally and, according to one poll, is beating Rudy as the choice among all Republicans.  

So what does this mean for the Republican field?  Well, for one, it means that Rudy is no longer the sole "frontrunner".  Just a month ago, Rudy held a commanding 15 point lead over his nearest opponent.  But now, that lead has shrunk to 3-5 points, and in one case, as I mentioned above, he is no longer ahead.   This change in momentum is clearly reinforced by the media.  Rudy used to be the only GOP candidate to get any serious "buzz" in the media, but not anymore.  For the last two weeks, Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney have sucked up most of that media attention.  And, to make matters even worse for the falling Giuliani, the little attention paid to him has been negative to say the least.

  

Although I am sure Huckabee is gleeful for his sudden surge, he might not want to be so quick to celebrate.  For the previous 11 months of the campaign, Huckabee has been able to dodge the tough questions by simply not being considered a  serious contender.  But, with his newfound frontrunner status, comes newfound tough questions.  

If the past week is any indication, Huckabee might not be ready for the tough questions.  When asked what he made of the latest NIE, Huckabee responded that he didn't know what the reporter was talking about.  The reporter then had to go on to explain what the NIE was and it was then that Huckabee admitted to not knowing about it or what it contained.  This interview was a full day and a half after the report had been released; Huckabee had ample time to read and analyze it.  

Huckabee also came under a firestorm of criticism from the Huffington Post, who reported on a story that Huckabee, as governor of Arkansas, released a serial rapist who went on to kill a women.  Huckabee handled the situation rather poorly.  Instead of stating his reasons, if there are any sane ones, for this man's release, Huckabee more or less blamed the media for "getting it all wrong".  Blaming the media for everything is no way to handle a campaign; that line is old and people simply don't buy it anymore.  Huckabee would have done himself much better to just have said that he made a mistake and that he deeply regrets what happened.  Everyone makes a mistake; the public can accept that.  What the public can't and won't accept is baselessly blaming the media for, in essence, doing their job.

Possibly the biggest problem for Huckabee is his lack of money.  To my knowledge, Huckabee has around $2 million on hand and has recently spent much of that money on air time in the early primary states.  While $2 million may seem like a lot to an ordinary person, it is nothing in the brutal world of Presidential politics.  How can Huckabee be competitive when Romney can write himself a $10 million check when ever needed?

The last thing that I see being a huge problem for Huckabee is the New Hampshire primary.  Huckabee seems to be a safe bet to win Iowa.  But, if there is one state Huckabee does poorly in, its New Hampshire.  New Hampshire, I would estimate, has about half the evangelical voters that Iowa and South Carolina have and evangelicals are Huckabee's base.  Mitt Romney still looks poised to win New Hampshire.  The next big primary is South Carolina, where Huckabee's evangelical base could give him a win, but at this moment, that seems unlikely.  Romney still does very well in South Carolina and the momentum from a New Hampshire win (and subsequently Michigan and possibly Nevada), could prove to give Romney the win in South Carolina and hence knock Huckabee down and out of the race.

In short: Huckabee has come a hell of a long way in just a few weeks, but he still has a hell of a long way to come.  

The Rosetta Stone To War in Iraq (Part I)

The President of the United States, George W. Bush, knowingly misled the American people and ordered the invasion and occupation of Iraq.  That is an impeachable offense.  The President lied when he said:  (1) Iraq has stockpiles of WMD ready to use against America or transferred to terrorists.  (2) Iraq has reconstituted its nuclear weapons program.  (3) Iraq has mobile labs that manufacture chemical and biological WMD.  (4) Iraq is an eminent threat to the security of the U.S. (5) Saddam has a relationship with Al Qaeda and the 9-11 attack.

 

The Rosetta Stone to Mr. Bush's lies are found in the reports of David Kay and Charles Duelfer.  Both had CIA connections and ran the Iraqi study group in the hunt for WMD in Iraq after the invasion.  Both had weapons inspection experience.  After their exhausting inspections in Iraq they came back and said, "we were all wrong."  Iraq got rid of its WMD after the 1991 Gulf War, 12 years prior to our invasion.  Their findings were (1) Iraq had no stockpiles of WMD.  (2) Iraq had no mobile labs to manufacture WMD.  (3) Iraq did not reconstitute its nuclear weapons program.  (4) Iraq had no ready manufacturing facilities to resume such activity.  (5)  There was no evidence of a collaborative relationship with al Qaeda and the events of 9-11.

 

Since these weapons did not exist at any time during Bush's administration, the intelligence community could not have given Bush any proof or confirmation that they did exist.  That is why Bush nor the CIA showed the people any photographic evidence of these WMD.  President Kennedy, during the Cuban missile crisis of 1962, showed the American people, and the world, photographic evidence of Russian missiles in Cuba on their launch pads.  There were no doubts.

 

The President, lacking proof and confirmation that Iraq possessed WMD, decided to plant the seed in the people's mind that Iraq was involved in the events of 9-11.  Because these weapons did not exist, the CIA could not pass on any information to the U.N. inspectors, who were on the ground in Iraq, that revealed WMD, even though Defense Secretary Rumsfeld said he knew where they were located.. 

 

David Kay reported that the CIA gave him over 500 suspected sites in Iraq to inspect.  When he went over the list and report he was astonished.  Nothing was new or updated, everything was all old information with no collaboration.  The report was useless.  The CIA was clueless.  Kay and Duelfel also reported that Saddam still had the intent after the U.N. sanctions were lifted, but they found no evidence of a plan, people in place, or any structure to restart any weapons program.

 

Because Bush could not back up his rhetoric about Iraq's WMD, V.P. Cheney kept going back to the intelligence community and putting pressure on them to come up with something.  Because of this pressure, the CIA became political on the issue.  When no WMD were found, the President started to give other reasons why it was necessary to go to war in Iraq.  The gig was up.

 

Part II, coming shortly, will focus on the other Rosetta Stone to the war in Iraq and why Bush knew Iraq was not a threat to the United States.