The Presidential Election and The Economy: Part I

Over 45 years ago, President Kennedy, in his State of the Union address of January 14, 1963, spoke about the economy and pushed for a reduction and revision in federal income taxes.  However, in conflict with Republicans say today, Kennedy had the wisdom to understand that tax reduction was not enough to sustain the economy and told the American people so.  His tax proposal did pass Congress, but was not tilted in favor of the wealthy or Corporate America, but rather the America middle class.

 

Here are some excerpts from President Kennedy's State of the Union address which outlines the broader picture for a stable economy:

 

"America has enjoyed twenty-two months of uninterrupted economic recovery.  But recovery is not enough.  If we are to prevail in the long run, we must expand the long-run strength of our economy.  We must move along the path to a higher rate of growth and full employment.(...)

 

I do not say that a measure for tax reduction and reform is the only way to achieve these goals.  No doubt a massive increase in federal spending could also create jobs and growth-- but in today's setting, private consumers, employers, and investors should be given a full opportunity first.

 

No doubt a reduction in either individual or corporation taxes alone would be of great help--but corporations need customers and job seekers need jobs.

 

Tax reduction, alone, however, is not enough to strengthen our society, to provide opportunities for the four million americans who are born each year, to improve the lives of thirty-two million americans who live on the outskirts of poverty.  The quality of American life must keep pace with the quantity of american goods.  This country cannot afford to be materially rich and spiritually poor.

 

First we need to strengthen our nation by investing in our youth.  The future of any country which is dependent upon the will and wisdom of its citizens is damaged and irreparably damaged, whenever any of its children is not educated to the full extent of his talent, from grade school through graduate school.  Today, an estimated four out of every ten students in fifth grade will not even finish high school-- and that is a waste we cannot afford.

 

In addition there is no reason why one million young Americans, out of school and out of work, should all remain unwanted and often untrained on our city streets when their energies can be put to good use.

 

We shall be judged more by what we do at home than by what we preach abroad.  Nothing we could do to help the developing countries would help them half as much as a booming U.S. economy.  And nothing our opponents could do to encourage their own ambitions would encourage them half as much as a chronic U.S. economy.  These domestic tasks do not divert energy from our security--they provide the very foundation for freedom's survival and success."

Both parties could learn a great deal from President Kennedy's economic policies.  

 

Next Up, Part II

A Step Back From Our Preoccupation With The Election: A Look Back At The Kennedy Assassination

President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963, almost 45 years ago.  Lee Harvey Oswald was the killer according to the Warren Report and was assassinated himself just two days later.  The Warren Report concluded Oswald shot Kennedy with his rifle from the sixth floor window in the Texas School Book Depository Building as Kennedy's motorcade passed by.  However, Oswald did not fire any rifle that day in Dallas, much less his own.  Unfortunately, he could not stand trial and defend himself. 

 

The public has been lied to all these years by our own government and the crime has been covered up.  The key to Oswald's innocence is easily determined by common sense.  Only one witness identified Oswald as being in the sixth floor window of the TSBDB, Howard Brennan.  His story to the FBI varied from month to month and then positively identified Oswald as the man he saw in the window.  But Howard Brennan failed to pick Oswald out and positively identify him in a police lineup. 

 

Lee Oswald, while in jail, said he was just a patsy.  That was a true statement and our government knew it.  Here is the common sense part about Oswald's innocence:  The murder of a President is no common ordinary killing, yet we are supposed to believe that Oswald left the rifle he was supposed to use in the killing on the sixth floor, not very far from where the shooting was supposed to have taken place --- A rifle that could be easily identified and traced back to Oswald, and the government is going to tell us that he left it there on the scene to be found.  Give me a break.  Your ordinary killer does not even do such a stupid thing.  The rifle was planted.

 

Those who support the Warren Report always try to come up with explanations that have no bearing on the matter, but it wont wash.  A paraffin test was taken of Oswald's right side of his face to check for nitrates that are deposited after a rifle is fired.  The test were conducted by the Dallas City County Criminal Investigation Laboratory on November 23 and did not reveal any nitrates from having fired a rifle recently.

 

Lee Oswald was murdered because he never would have been convicted in a court of law for the murder of JFK --- That would have spelled conspiracy.  Our political system has never been the same since that tragic day in Dallas.

 

NOTE:  Information shown herein concerning  Oswalds identification and the paraffin test taken from Retired Police Chief Jesse Cury limited collectors edition of JFK Assassination File, published in 1969.