Thursday, June 18, 2015
Donald Trump: The Latest Republican To Enter The Presidential Race.
Donald Trump made it official on Tuesday when he announced he will seek the republican party's nomination for President of The United States. Many in the news media thought he would not run for various reasons. Trump immediately shook up his republican challengers and the conservative news media with his comments.Conservative journalists George Will and others had no kind words for Trump but Trump shot right back at them.
Trump said republicans talk a lot but accomplish very little. Any one who follows politics knows that is a true statement. Trump's republican challengers are trying to dodge his charges by passing him off as not a serious candidate. They know he is relevant because they will have to answer his charges about them sooner or later and would rather not.
They would rather spend their time attacking Hillary so they don't have to explain their own position. With so many republicans in the race Trump will liven up a campaign where each candidate are trying to convince the people he or she is the more conservative. Trump also dropped a "bomb" on the republicans when he told Fox News that out of the last four Presidents, Bill Clinton was the best. He is right of course, but no other republican would admit that.
This writer does not believe Trump will win his party's nomination but at least he will be one republican who will articulate what he would do if elected. His republican challengers will do what they always do, preach the ditto head conservative ideology and of course attack Hillary.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
Did The Louisiana Legislature Really Balance The State's Budget For Fiscal 2015-2016?
No, not really, because fiscal reality has escaped the republican controlled legislators and as in the past, before the new fiscal year ends the new governor and the legislator's auditor will announce the budget is out of balance. It will fit the same pattern as previous Jindal budgets that he and the legislature said were balanced. And you will have read it here first again in "PolitiDose."
The middle class and college students will be saddled with higher cost for college, smoking and buying automobiles while business will suffer some tax credit and tax breaks roll back for a period of 1 to 3 years at which time the tax breaks and credits will be available again.
Like on the federal level, the republicans in Louisiana always comes up with various ways to get into the average tax payers pockets while letting the business community off the hook. It should be remembered the business community continues to enjoy $8 billion in tax breaks.
Democratic representative John Bel Williams who is a candidate for Governor is the only candidate that can bring stability to Louisiana's fiscal health. The republican party had an opportunity to do so for 8 years and failed.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
The middle class and college students will be saddled with higher cost for college, smoking and buying automobiles while business will suffer some tax credit and tax breaks roll back for a period of 1 to 3 years at which time the tax breaks and credits will be available again.
Like on the federal level, the republicans in Louisiana always comes up with various ways to get into the average tax payers pockets while letting the business community off the hook. It should be remembered the business community continues to enjoy $8 billion in tax breaks.
Democratic representative John Bel Williams who is a candidate for Governor is the only candidate that can bring stability to Louisiana's fiscal health. The republican party had an opportunity to do so for 8 years and failed.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Friday, June 12, 2015
The Ugly Side Of Technology
How many times do we have to hear the same song? Hackers tap into the computer systems of business, of government and individuals and obtain information that is both personal and other wise. Our intelligence community has the same capacity and we have been using it for many years. So what else is new? Is there any one out there that thinks the problem will be resolved soon?
This ugly side of technology has been used by governments all over the world as another tool for intelligence gathering and when they do so they sweep up every bit of information in sight. Now its about cyber technology theft which we are told is a greater danger. We have heard the reports of the U.S. hacking into Iran's computer system that runs their nuclear program and shutting down their operations for several weeks.
When will it all stop? It won't, make no mistake about that. The advances in technology has out striped the ability to make a fail safe system. More and more individuals every day learn the skills to beat the system. And many social media outlets post personal information that can be tapped into easily.
Changes will have to be made overtime how the internet is used and what information should be carried in order to make it harder for hackers to obtain access. The problem can be slowed down but don't look for any progress on the matter in the near future.
The only safe system for computer technology is to refrain from using it.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
This ugly side of technology has been used by governments all over the world as another tool for intelligence gathering and when they do so they sweep up every bit of information in sight. Now its about cyber technology theft which we are told is a greater danger. We have heard the reports of the U.S. hacking into Iran's computer system that runs their nuclear program and shutting down their operations for several weeks.
When will it all stop? It won't, make no mistake about that. The advances in technology has out striped the ability to make a fail safe system. More and more individuals every day learn the skills to beat the system. And many social media outlets post personal information that can be tapped into easily.
Changes will have to be made overtime how the internet is used and what information should be carried in order to make it harder for hackers to obtain access. The problem can be slowed down but don't look for any progress on the matter in the near future.
The only safe system for computer technology is to refrain from using it.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
MSNBC, The Affordable Care Act and Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
The hosts of Hardball and All In with Chris Matthews and Chris Hayes passed up an opportunity to offer their viewers a more accurate answer to statements made by their guest concerning health care Tuesday night.
Both host in talking about the Supreme Courts up coming decision on the ACA had guest who said the republicans had 5 years to come up with their own health care plan and had failed to do so. The fact of the matter is the republicans also had 8 years under republicn President George W. Bush to come up with a health care plan and failed.
Health care did not become a problem on Obama's watch. It has been a problem for over two decades. That is how long government, business and the people have been dealing with the high cost of health care and the uninsured. Matthews and Hayes should have brought that up so their viewers could have a better understanding just how republicans have failed to act on the issue.
Hayes on his show reported how Rumsfeld was walking back a statement he made only the day before concerning Iraq. The news media failed to challenge many statements by Rumsfeld during the runup to war and even during the war and its aftermath. What MSNBC should have shown long ago is an interview of Rumsfeld on Meet the Press during the run up to war in Iraq. The interview was conducted by Tim Russert, Meet the Press moderator at the time.
Rumsfeld told Russert, "We know where Saddam has hidden his WMD, they are hidden in and around Tikrit." That was Saddam's home town. But Saddam got rid of his WMD in 1991 according to the U.S. inspection team that searched Iraq. That was 12 years before the invasion. So American intelligence could not have offered Rumsfeld any proof that Saddam had WMD hidden since they did not exist at any time during the Bush 43 administration. What is so important about that Meet the Press interview is that it showed how far the Bush administration was willing to go in lying to the public. It also explains why Bush never showed the American people photographic evidence of Iraq's WMD.
Unlike President Kennedy who during the Cuban missile crisis showed America and the world photographic evidence of Soviet missiles in Cuba. The news media was never curious why Bush did not produce evidence of Iraq's WMD. President Bush committed an impeachable act in his handling of the Iraq war and the news media caved in. It was a different story when they were right there with the republicans when they impeached President Clinton over an affair.
Since MSNBC is part of the NBC family they can easily check out the Rumsfeld interview on Meet the Press and rerun it.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Both host in talking about the Supreme Courts up coming decision on the ACA had guest who said the republicans had 5 years to come up with their own health care plan and had failed to do so. The fact of the matter is the republicans also had 8 years under republicn President George W. Bush to come up with a health care plan and failed.
Health care did not become a problem on Obama's watch. It has been a problem for over two decades. That is how long government, business and the people have been dealing with the high cost of health care and the uninsured. Matthews and Hayes should have brought that up so their viewers could have a better understanding just how republicans have failed to act on the issue.
Hayes on his show reported how Rumsfeld was walking back a statement he made only the day before concerning Iraq. The news media failed to challenge many statements by Rumsfeld during the runup to war and even during the war and its aftermath. What MSNBC should have shown long ago is an interview of Rumsfeld on Meet the Press during the run up to war in Iraq. The interview was conducted by Tim Russert, Meet the Press moderator at the time.
Rumsfeld told Russert, "We know where Saddam has hidden his WMD, they are hidden in and around Tikrit." That was Saddam's home town. But Saddam got rid of his WMD in 1991 according to the U.S. inspection team that searched Iraq. That was 12 years before the invasion. So American intelligence could not have offered Rumsfeld any proof that Saddam had WMD hidden since they did not exist at any time during the Bush 43 administration. What is so important about that Meet the Press interview is that it showed how far the Bush administration was willing to go in lying to the public. It also explains why Bush never showed the American people photographic evidence of Iraq's WMD.
Unlike President Kennedy who during the Cuban missile crisis showed America and the world photographic evidence of Soviet missiles in Cuba. The news media was never curious why Bush did not produce evidence of Iraq's WMD. President Bush committed an impeachable act in his handling of the Iraq war and the news media caved in. It was a different story when they were right there with the republicans when they impeached President Clinton over an affair.
Since MSNBC is part of the NBC family they can easily check out the Rumsfeld interview on Meet the Press and rerun it.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Sunday, June 7, 2015
The U.S. Economy Created 280,000 Jobs In May
It was the 63rd. straight month of positive job growth under the Obama administration and job creation for March and April were revised upward by 32,000 more jobs than previously reported. The unemployment rate was 8.5% up from 8.4% in April. The small increase was attributed to the fact that hundreds of thousands more people began looking for jobs in May. So says a report by the U.S. Labor Department.
Construction, health care and hospitality drove the job growth in May. The oil industry shed workers for the fifth straight month because of oil prices. Average hourly wages rose 2.3% from the previous year. The number of people applying for unemployment benefits weekly remained at a historically low, 300,000 for more than four months. The recovery is expected to continue thru the end of the year and into 2016.
If the republican controlled congress ever passes the transportation bill they have been sitting on forever, the economy would enjoy a much broader increase with better paying jobs. That should be priority number one. The time for action is now. Forget about the TPP trade agreement and do something for the domestic economy.
The American economy as a whole still has a way to go for all to have jobs that are well paying and sustainable but it will not happen unless more action is taken by congress. The President's policies has worked for the economy, but more has to be done. The President continues to do his part. Will republicans ever answer the challenge and do their part?
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Construction, health care and hospitality drove the job growth in May. The oil industry shed workers for the fifth straight month because of oil prices. Average hourly wages rose 2.3% from the previous year. The number of people applying for unemployment benefits weekly remained at a historically low, 300,000 for more than four months. The recovery is expected to continue thru the end of the year and into 2016.
If the republican controlled congress ever passes the transportation bill they have been sitting on forever, the economy would enjoy a much broader increase with better paying jobs. That should be priority number one. The time for action is now. Forget about the TPP trade agreement and do something for the domestic economy.
The American economy as a whole still has a way to go for all to have jobs that are well paying and sustainable but it will not happen unless more action is taken by congress. The President's policies has worked for the economy, but more has to be done. The President continues to do his part. Will republicans ever answer the challenge and do their part?
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Friday, June 5, 2015
Part V Algiers: State Representative Jeff Arnold Wants To Make Algiers A Separate City On The West Bank
Representative Arnold's House bill 744 that proposed to make Algiers a separate city on the west bank within the City of New Orleans was blocked by a Senate committee on Thursday June 4. So says a Times Picayune article of June 5. The blocking of the framework for Algiers to incorporate killed the issue for the immediate future.
This writers four part commentary on the matter published here in "PolitiDose" was an attempt to try and look at the issue from a perspective other than a lack of service for Algiers. Mr. Arnold also tossed around the idea of both Algiers and Jefferson Parish on the west bank to secede from Orleans and Jefferson Parish.
Algiers, which is the 15th ward in Orleans Parish has the same problems with a lack of service like other wards in the Parish. This writer feels that is due to the many, many years of neglect by previous mayors and a unstable revenue base. Mitch Landrieu has done a good job at addressing the many problems and progress can be seen in this writers opinion. Because of past neglect, the job of reversing that neglect will take a little longer.
The big problem with Mr. Arnold's proposal which began in 2004 was it never was driven by the citizens of Algiers or Jefferson Parish and as a result it was not well thought out. The real answer for progress in Algiers is for its citizens to make their voices heard by our elected representatives so they and the mayor can work together to see that progress is being made.
Mayor Landrieu has done well in improving the city's budget problems and that will go a long way in moving Algiers and the rest of the city forward. The Senate committee did the right thing in rejecting House bill 744.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
This writers four part commentary on the matter published here in "PolitiDose" was an attempt to try and look at the issue from a perspective other than a lack of service for Algiers. Mr. Arnold also tossed around the idea of both Algiers and Jefferson Parish on the west bank to secede from Orleans and Jefferson Parish.
Algiers, which is the 15th ward in Orleans Parish has the same problems with a lack of service like other wards in the Parish. This writer feels that is due to the many, many years of neglect by previous mayors and a unstable revenue base. Mitch Landrieu has done a good job at addressing the many problems and progress can be seen in this writers opinion. Because of past neglect, the job of reversing that neglect will take a little longer.
The big problem with Mr. Arnold's proposal which began in 2004 was it never was driven by the citizens of Algiers or Jefferson Parish and as a result it was not well thought out. The real answer for progress in Algiers is for its citizens to make their voices heard by our elected representatives so they and the mayor can work together to see that progress is being made.
Mayor Landrieu has done well in improving the city's budget problems and that will go a long way in moving Algiers and the rest of the city forward. The Senate committee did the right thing in rejecting House bill 744.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Sunday, May 31, 2015
Rewriting The Facts About The Iraq War
That is what Erick Erickson has attempted to accomplish in his column that appeared in the Times Picayune of May 31 in the "Reflection" section titled, " ISIL Sprang Up On Obama's Watch." Erickson, the right wing conservative columnist is up set because republican Presidential candidates who are running for their party's nomination has had a difficult time answering questions about their support of the war and occupation of Iraq over WMD that did not exist and Bush's failure to take responsibility for the failure of that war.
Erick is also upset because President Obama ended the war as he said he would do when he campaigned for President. The right winger complained that Obama should have left American troops in Iraq and if he would have done that there would be no ISIL. Erickson rewrite of the facts exposes his true character. The reason no American troops were left in Iraq is because Iraq would not guarantee America and its troops immunity from Iraqi laws. Bush could not get Iraq's government to do so before he left office so the matter fell to President Obama when he took office. Obama ended our troop deployment when Iraq's governing body failed to vote on the matter.
The U.S. withdrawal from Iraq did not change the fact that Iraq's prime minister al-Maliki was running the Iraqi government as he had been for over a year. He was backed by the Bush administration to be the prime minister against other candidates. The so called Bush surge in Iraq was supposed to give al-Maliki the time necessary to unite Iraq's various factions but instead he made things worse for the Sunni's and failed to have a united government.
ISIL was created on al-Maliki's watch at a time American had no presence in Iraq and was created as a sister organization of Al Queda in Iraq and it happened because Iraq was a destabilized country made possible by the war and occupation over WMD that did not exist and the removal of Saddam from power
who kept Al Queda and other terror groups out of Iraq.
What really chaps Erickson and other conservative journalists is for years they have tried to plant the republican seed that democrats are soft on terror and the country's defense and that republicans are best at protecting America and its people. The facts tell a different story. The worst foreign terror attack on U.S. soil happened on 9/11/01 and it happened on the watch of President George W. Bush and it happened while he tried to talk and act tough.
The worst foreign terror attack against America on foreign soil happened on the watch of President Ronald Reagan when terrorists blew up the Marine compound in Lebanon killing 241 U.S. Marines. Reagan was also talking tough at the time and told the terrorists they could run but could not hide. But the fact is that the terrorists who were responsible for planning the cowardly act were never brought to justice by the Reagan administration.
What chaps Erickson and conservatives even more is the fact that President Obama has kept America safe from terror attacks since he has been in office and has brought Bin Laden and other terror leaders to justice. His administration has done so because of policy and priority and not a show off attitude of the so called republican chicken hawks.
Erickson can not rewrite the history of the Bush failure in the unnecessary war in Iraq over WMD that did not exist. As a reminder to Erickson, General Colin Powell, Bush's Secretary of State during Bush's first term in office told Bush during the run up to war in Iraq, "if you break it, you own it." Well President Bush broke Iraq and he still owns it. And worse, he left town without fixing it.
And that really says it all.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Erick is also upset because President Obama ended the war as he said he would do when he campaigned for President. The right winger complained that Obama should have left American troops in Iraq and if he would have done that there would be no ISIL. Erickson rewrite of the facts exposes his true character. The reason no American troops were left in Iraq is because Iraq would not guarantee America and its troops immunity from Iraqi laws. Bush could not get Iraq's government to do so before he left office so the matter fell to President Obama when he took office. Obama ended our troop deployment when Iraq's governing body failed to vote on the matter.
The U.S. withdrawal from Iraq did not change the fact that Iraq's prime minister al-Maliki was running the Iraqi government as he had been for over a year. He was backed by the Bush administration to be the prime minister against other candidates. The so called Bush surge in Iraq was supposed to give al-Maliki the time necessary to unite Iraq's various factions but instead he made things worse for the Sunni's and failed to have a united government.
ISIL was created on al-Maliki's watch at a time American had no presence in Iraq and was created as a sister organization of Al Queda in Iraq and it happened because Iraq was a destabilized country made possible by the war and occupation over WMD that did not exist and the removal of Saddam from power
who kept Al Queda and other terror groups out of Iraq.
What really chaps Erickson and other conservative journalists is for years they have tried to plant the republican seed that democrats are soft on terror and the country's defense and that republicans are best at protecting America and its people. The facts tell a different story. The worst foreign terror attack on U.S. soil happened on 9/11/01 and it happened on the watch of President George W. Bush and it happened while he tried to talk and act tough.
The worst foreign terror attack against America on foreign soil happened on the watch of President Ronald Reagan when terrorists blew up the Marine compound in Lebanon killing 241 U.S. Marines. Reagan was also talking tough at the time and told the terrorists they could run but could not hide. But the fact is that the terrorists who were responsible for planning the cowardly act were never brought to justice by the Reagan administration.
What chaps Erickson and conservatives even more is the fact that President Obama has kept America safe from terror attacks since he has been in office and has brought Bin Laden and other terror leaders to justice. His administration has done so because of policy and priority and not a show off attitude of the so called republican chicken hawks.
Erickson can not rewrite the history of the Bush failure in the unnecessary war in Iraq over WMD that did not exist. As a reminder to Erickson, General Colin Powell, Bush's Secretary of State during Bush's first term in office told Bush during the run up to war in Iraq, "if you break it, you own it." Well President Bush broke Iraq and he still owns it. And worse, he left town without fixing it.
And that really says it all.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Thursday, May 28, 2015
Cokie and Steve Roberts: The Latest Journalists In A Tizzy Over Hillary's Campaign Style
Cokie and Steve are the latest media people bent out of shape because Hillary Clinton is taking her campaign directly to the people instead of through the news media and its journalists per their commentary in the New Orleans Advocate dated 5/22/15. In fact they ask the question, "what is she afraid of?" Well, with 18 months left to the election this writer believes she is not afraid of anything.
It seems Cokie and Steve are the ones who are afraid as the people who vote are not up set the way Hillary's campaign is moving. And maybe Hillary understands the role social media now plays in elections. For those who follow politics Hillary's positions are known on the issues because she has been around long enough and has spoke to the issues for many years.
What Cokie, Steve and the cable news networks want is to rehash Benghazi, her Iraq vote, her personal emails and other issues that have been put to bed. To them, its really not about answering questions, she has already done that and been there.
Let me assure Cokie and Steve that when the Presidential primaries start Hillary will find the time to sooth their ego's with conversations. That is soon enough because the debates will be in full swing. In the meantime the news media has enough ink and air time to say what ever they want to say about Hillary.
The bottom line when it comes to campaigns is that everyone knows what policies the democratic candidates will pursue because they articulate that during the campaign. The republicans simply campaign on personal attacks and divisive issues and never articulate policy. Maybe Cokie and Steve can tell America what policies the republicans have besides their conservative ideology, which is no policy at all.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Another Big First For "PolitiDose"
Robert Mann's commentary in the Reflections section of the Times Picayune of May 24 pointed out the state of Louisiana's economic and fiscal problems by describing conditions this writer has pointed out many times in past issues of commentary here in "PolitiDose." Mann makes the following comments in his article. They should all be familiar to the readers of "PolitiDose."
Louisiana has the 4th. highest unemployment rate in the nation. Louisiana's economy does not produce enough tax revenue to support higher education, health care and other vital services. The State's average weekly earnings were down 1% over the last year adjusted for inflation. Louisiana's economic miracle is a mirage.
Our governor and his legislative enablers have handed big business the keys to the state treasury for seven years. They eagerly bestowed enormous tax exemptions and direct state appropriations on dozens of out of state corporations, all after recklessly slashing income taxes for the wealthy in 1980. Jindal and many conservatives have sold tax cuts as an economic panacea. The evidence does not support their policies. We punish the poor with higher tax rates than the rich and neglect our basis services -- all in service subsidizing big business by relieving them of the responsibility to support essential government functions.
It is very noticeable that the various forms of the media in Louisiana and even members of the state legislature are now finally talking about the above issues they were silent on since Jindal took office. And to top it off their silence took place at the same time Jindal and the legislature announced that the budgets were balance and then had to acknowledge 6 months before the end of the budget year the budgets were out of balance.
Trickle down economics of tax breaks for business is not an economic policy and does not increase needed revenue or create jobs. That conservative ideology of the republican party died long ago in favor of responsible policy making. Jindal will leave office learning nothing from the past and the republican party's bragging that Louisiana is a republican state is not very flattering.
"PolitiDose" will continue to lead the way with facts and inform the people while events are taking place. This writer has no interest in being a "follower." And yes, understanding the mistakes of the past is the key to a better future for all.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio.
Louisiana has the 4th. highest unemployment rate in the nation. Louisiana's economy does not produce enough tax revenue to support higher education, health care and other vital services. The State's average weekly earnings were down 1% over the last year adjusted for inflation. Louisiana's economic miracle is a mirage.
Our governor and his legislative enablers have handed big business the keys to the state treasury for seven years. They eagerly bestowed enormous tax exemptions and direct state appropriations on dozens of out of state corporations, all after recklessly slashing income taxes for the wealthy in 1980. Jindal and many conservatives have sold tax cuts as an economic panacea. The evidence does not support their policies. We punish the poor with higher tax rates than the rich and neglect our basis services -- all in service subsidizing big business by relieving them of the responsibility to support essential government functions.
It is very noticeable that the various forms of the media in Louisiana and even members of the state legislature are now finally talking about the above issues they were silent on since Jindal took office. And to top it off their silence took place at the same time Jindal and the legislature announced that the budgets were balance and then had to acknowledge 6 months before the end of the budget year the budgets were out of balance.
Trickle down economics of tax breaks for business is not an economic policy and does not increase needed revenue or create jobs. That conservative ideology of the republican party died long ago in favor of responsible policy making. Jindal will leave office learning nothing from the past and the republican party's bragging that Louisiana is a republican state is not very flattering.
"PolitiDose" will continue to lead the way with facts and inform the people while events are taking place. This writer has no interest in being a "follower." And yes, understanding the mistakes of the past is the key to a better future for all.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio.
Monday, May 25, 2015
Campaign Finance Reform: The Story Continues
"PolitiDose" has offered several past commentary on how to effect campaign finance reform from special interest groups deep money pockets and their money influence in Washington. There is a very legal and working solution to the problem that the courts have no recourse on.
But oddly enough, a Supreme Court ruling a few years ago known as "Citizens United" opened the door for congress to implement campaign finance reform. The Supreme Court ruling basically said Corporations are people which opened the door for unlimited spending by Corporations on campaign ads. Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney during the 2012 election said he agreed that Corporations are people.
If Corporations are people, the court opened the door for congress to say, okay, if Corporations are people you will be treated like the ordinary citizen and all Corporate Welfare tax breaks, loop holes and tax give aways are going to be eliminated. Congress has the authority to do that and bring balance to the courts decision. Does congress have the will to do that? No, because they lack character and courage as a legislative body. But if they would find the virtue to do that and stick to their guns Corporations would call off their lavish spending on political campaigns.
The beauty of this type of campaign finance reform and the previous one I wrote about is that the courts have no legal authority in the matter, it could be done in a short period of time and would cost the tax payers zero. Robert Kennedy was quoted as saying the following: Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not. Its past time for congress to find a Robert Kenned out there who can make a difference in campaign finance reform.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
But oddly enough, a Supreme Court ruling a few years ago known as "Citizens United" opened the door for congress to implement campaign finance reform. The Supreme Court ruling basically said Corporations are people which opened the door for unlimited spending by Corporations on campaign ads. Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney during the 2012 election said he agreed that Corporations are people.
If Corporations are people, the court opened the door for congress to say, okay, if Corporations are people you will be treated like the ordinary citizen and all Corporate Welfare tax breaks, loop holes and tax give aways are going to be eliminated. Congress has the authority to do that and bring balance to the courts decision. Does congress have the will to do that? No, because they lack character and courage as a legislative body. But if they would find the virtue to do that and stick to their guns Corporations would call off their lavish spending on political campaigns.
The beauty of this type of campaign finance reform and the previous one I wrote about is that the courts have no legal authority in the matter, it could be done in a short period of time and would cost the tax payers zero. Robert Kennedy was quoted as saying the following: Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not. Its past time for congress to find a Robert Kenned out there who can make a difference in campaign finance reform.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)