In a Times Picayune article dated 1/23/15 state representative Jeff Arnold wants Algiers and West Jefferson to secede from New Orleans and Jefferson Parish and form Louisiana's 65th. parish. His reason: "The resulting local government would be more responsive to residents concerns, including crime and blight. The proposal could serve as leverage to gain more attention for West Jefferson parish government and his main interest more attention for Algiers from New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu."
Arnold's proposal is not as simple as he outlines in the article and all west bankers should be concerned especially those who reside in Algiers and who have done so all their lives. "PolitiDose" will publish in several "parts" commentary concerning the issues Arnold raised in his article and also other issues that would be affected by the move. West bankers are free to comment here in "PolitiDose" as to their thoughts concerning the matter, just click on "comments." I will email representative Arnold a copy of each one of my commentaries as we move forward.
As a point of information, the population of six cities on the West Bank are shown below:
Algiers 60,000 Per Arnold's article\
Marrero 33,141 (2010) Per City Web Page
Terrytown 23,319 (2010) " "
Harvey 20,348 (2010) " "
Gretna 17,802 (2013) " "
Westwego 8,524 (2012) " "
Arnold's reason for a new parish seem to be in conflict. Does he really want a new West Bank parish or just a converssation to have leverage with Mayor Mitch Landrieu to do more for Algiers as he says in his statement. He also believes Algiers and the West Bank are not properly represented by both Parish officials. Does that mean he is talking about himself since he represents Algiers?
The statement made by Arnold that Algiers has one member on the City Council is correct but there are also two at large seats that represent the whole city that includes Algiers. This writer had an opportunity just recently to work with all three on a problem in Algiers and they all worked together to solve the problem.
As a life long resident of Algiers I have not been exposed to the idea that its citizens are so dissatisfied that they want to secede from New Orleans. I have family and friends that live in Jefferson Parish on the West Bank and the same applies there. As an example of Algiers needing more attention Arnold tries to relate a time element as to how quick Gretna can respond to citizens concerns compared to New Orleans response. Well Gretna's population is 17,802 compared to Algiers 60,000. I don't think some one using that silly comparison is qualified to lead the issue. Arnold also wants Gretna to be the parish seat of the new parish government. This writer does not buy that and I will have a special commentary concerning Algiers.
Federal City located in Algiers on the property that was the former Naval Station will become a great venue of progress for its citizens if handled properlyand will draw more people and industry to Algiers even from other cities on the West Bank, especially Gretna which is adjacent to Algiers. Is this really the reason we are hearing talk about seceding?
Stay tuned for Part II and beyond.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Saturday, January 31, 2015
The Historic Price Of A Barrel Of Oil
Today's falling oil prices are still much higher than its historical price and as a result so is the price of a gallon of gasoline. Both move in the same direction. Outside of Saudi Arabia's oil embargo in the 1970's the Saudi's supported a stable price that does not bounce back and forth wildly. That is one reason they have not cut their production. With the event of a new Saudi king we will find out soon enough if that country changes its tune.
A stable price is better for the economy even for those countries who produce most of the oil. It is also good for the economy in general for all nations. An example: Louisiana is seeing its state revenue falling from lower taxes collected. The oil industry has already announced cuts and layoffs. A strong U.S. dollar, weaker energy consumption and economic conditions in Europe are also playing a part in the falling price. But those are market related and do not cause the wild swing in price when the price is at a stable level.
The following information is taken from Inflation Data.com, Historical Crude Oil Prices, 1946 - Nov. 2014. Prices shown are the nominal price and the price adjusted for inflation to 11/2014. The prices shown represent the average yearly price of a barrel of oil and not the higher or lower price but the yearly average.
From 1969 - 2003, a total of 35 years, the average yearly nominal price for a barrel of oil was $18.37. When adjusted for inflation the average yearly price was $42.19 per barrel. From 2004 - Nov. 2014 a period of 11 years the average yearly nominal price of a barrel of oil was $70.92. When adjusted for inflation it was $76.95 a barrel.
The numbers show the price of a barrel of oil started its climb in 2004, nine months after the invasion of Iraq and continued its rise until just a few months ago. That 11 year period saw the highest sustained price for a barrel of oil over the past 46 years. It appears to this writer that the price is trying to settle some where around its historical number with maybe some adjustments. Its important for the U.S. economy to continue to grow and stay strong at home and abroad. Stability has an equalizing effect on economic conditions. That was seen during the Clinton administration with lower inflation, lower unemployment, balanced budgets, increase in middle class wages and guess what else? The most stable oil prices in that 46 year period. The average yearly nominal price for a barrel of oil was $18.02; adjusted for inflation it was $26.84.
Stable economic conditions lifts every one up and the oil producing countries, including the U.S., the oil traders and manipulating prices becomes less effective and sustainable. It makes economic sense for the price of a barrel of oil to return to a stable price level with only minor movement. What is taking place now is a prelude to where the price may finally settle. For those who think the added oil production from "fracking" will make Saudi Arabia moot, forget about it. Saudi Arabia does not compete with "fracking." In fact they are still pumping while some U.S. "fracking" operations are being reduced because of the cost.
The 11 year stretch of high prices resulted in doubling the cost of filling up an automobile with a tank of gas. That can not be sustained without damaging the U.S. economy and helped prolong the recession of 2008. That is money taking out of the economy. Consumers spend more when the economy has balance. The past has proved that and understanding the past is still the key to a better future.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
A stable price is better for the economy even for those countries who produce most of the oil. It is also good for the economy in general for all nations. An example: Louisiana is seeing its state revenue falling from lower taxes collected. The oil industry has already announced cuts and layoffs. A strong U.S. dollar, weaker energy consumption and economic conditions in Europe are also playing a part in the falling price. But those are market related and do not cause the wild swing in price when the price is at a stable level.
The following information is taken from Inflation Data.com, Historical Crude Oil Prices, 1946 - Nov. 2014. Prices shown are the nominal price and the price adjusted for inflation to 11/2014. The prices shown represent the average yearly price of a barrel of oil and not the higher or lower price but the yearly average.
From 1969 - 2003, a total of 35 years, the average yearly nominal price for a barrel of oil was $18.37. When adjusted for inflation the average yearly price was $42.19 per barrel. From 2004 - Nov. 2014 a period of 11 years the average yearly nominal price of a barrel of oil was $70.92. When adjusted for inflation it was $76.95 a barrel.
The numbers show the price of a barrel of oil started its climb in 2004, nine months after the invasion of Iraq and continued its rise until just a few months ago. That 11 year period saw the highest sustained price for a barrel of oil over the past 46 years. It appears to this writer that the price is trying to settle some where around its historical number with maybe some adjustments. Its important for the U.S. economy to continue to grow and stay strong at home and abroad. Stability has an equalizing effect on economic conditions. That was seen during the Clinton administration with lower inflation, lower unemployment, balanced budgets, increase in middle class wages and guess what else? The most stable oil prices in that 46 year period. The average yearly nominal price for a barrel of oil was $18.02; adjusted for inflation it was $26.84.
Stable economic conditions lifts every one up and the oil producing countries, including the U.S., the oil traders and manipulating prices becomes less effective and sustainable. It makes economic sense for the price of a barrel of oil to return to a stable price level with only minor movement. What is taking place now is a prelude to where the price may finally settle. For those who think the added oil production from "fracking" will make Saudi Arabia moot, forget about it. Saudi Arabia does not compete with "fracking." In fact they are still pumping while some U.S. "fracking" operations are being reduced because of the cost.
The 11 year stretch of high prices resulted in doubling the cost of filling up an automobile with a tank of gas. That can not be sustained without damaging the U.S. economy and helped prolong the recession of 2008. That is money taking out of the economy. Consumers spend more when the economy has balance. The past has proved that and understanding the past is still the key to a better future.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Thursday, January 29, 2015
The National Economic Outlook Continues To Be Bright While The State of Louisiana Stumbles.
The Congressional Budget Office reported the following: It projects solid economic growth for the next few years; increases in consumer spending; Business investment and residential spending will drive the economic expansion this year and the next few years; wages will increase; 19 million people will have health insurance because of the ACA; as a share of the economy the federal deficit this year will be slightly below the historical average of the past 50 years; the ACA will cost taxpayers about 20% less than projected in 2010 partly because of enrollment totals and health insurance premimums that are lower than expected; unemployment will continue to go down.
The information coming out of Louisiana tells a very different story: This years budget deficit for fiscal year ending June 30, 2015 is $283 million. $180 million has already been cut and $103 million will have to be cut in the next several months according to a report in the Times Picayune dated January 28; next years budget deficit for fiscal year ending June 30, 2016 is now projected to be $1.6 billion, up from a previous forecast of $1.4 billion; Louisiana had the largest increase in unemployment last year from 5.4% to 6.7%; state revenues are declining, partly because of lower oil prices but Jindal's previous budgets were all out of balance while oil prices were high and strong; jobs will be lost and vital programs will have to be cut once again; the $8 billion in tax exemptions for businesses will continue to erode Louisiana's revenues; the magnitude of those tax exemptions are irresponsible.
Governor Jindal's policies and the republican controlled legislature that rubberstamped his policies has bankrupt Louisiana's budget and the sad part is that republican representative Brett Geymann was quoted by the Times Picayune in an article dated January 28 and said, "We knew we were facing a large number, we choose to do nothing about it last year." Geymann is supposed to be a fiscal hawk. Yea, tell me another fairy tale.
The Jindal administration continues to get into the average persons pocket in 100 different ways while his personal attacks continue against the President and the President's successful policies. Jindal inherited a $800 million surplus from former governor Blanco and blew it big time. Obama inherited 8 straight years of federal budget deficits from former President George W. Bush and the federal deficit has been coming down on a steady basis with a renewed economy. And to think, Jindal runs only one state while Obama runs the nation. That really says it all.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Saturday, January 24, 2015
A Reasonable Decision By The New Orleans City Council
The New Orleans City Council voted unanimously to ban smoking in New Orleans bars, casinos and other named places. This writer believes it was a good common sense vote for the public good and a step in a healthier environment. My commentary titled, "Smoking Bans For Louisiana Casinos and Bars" dated 6/4/09 concerning the subject matter outlined my position on smoking.
At present there is a state wide ban on smoking in restaurants which I believe most people would agree has made for a better atmosphere while dining. People have even said the food taste better. Smokers feel like they have the right to smoke and I would point out that smoking bans have been in effect before health problems were taking into consideration over 50 years ago in movie theaters, in places of worship and some private places, but smokers still go to those places and have adjusted.
There are smoking ban laws on the books with in a certain distance from public buildings. I think most will agree that second hand smoke is more dangerous to one's health in a closed environment like a casino or bar than an open area. This writer travels to a non smoking casino on the Mississippi gulf coast rather than be exposed to the smoke in Louisiana casino's.
Cities and states are moving to a greener and healthier environment across the country and New Orleans should join the parade. Smokers can continue to smoke, they will just have to do what they do when they go to a movie, refrain from smoking for a couple of hours. Habits are hard to break but never fatal.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
At present there is a state wide ban on smoking in restaurants which I believe most people would agree has made for a better atmosphere while dining. People have even said the food taste better. Smokers feel like they have the right to smoke and I would point out that smoking bans have been in effect before health problems were taking into consideration over 50 years ago in movie theaters, in places of worship and some private places, but smokers still go to those places and have adjusted.
There are smoking ban laws on the books with in a certain distance from public buildings. I think most will agree that second hand smoke is more dangerous to one's health in a closed environment like a casino or bar than an open area. This writer travels to a non smoking casino on the Mississippi gulf coast rather than be exposed to the smoke in Louisiana casino's.
Cities and states are moving to a greener and healthier environment across the country and New Orleans should join the parade. Smokers can continue to smoke, they will just have to do what they do when they go to a movie, refrain from smoking for a couple of hours. Habits are hard to break but never fatal.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Friday, January 23, 2015
Louisiana's Bobby Jindal and The Fox News Network
Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal once again showed his true colors when he went to Europe and spoke about the "No Go Zones" scattered about the country. It was the same story the Fox News Network ran with a few days earlier. Fox News had to apologize and did so on 3 or 4 occasions for pushing the phony story but Jindal never did apologize.
The Mayor of Paris is reported to possibly looking at a suit against Fox News for their slander reporting. Other leaders in Europe have criticized Jindal and Fox News for their fairy tale reporting. Neither Fox nor Jindal could identify where the "No Go Zones" were located when asked. Those "No Go Zones" are as elusive as Iraq's WMD and the scandal called Benghazi that was fabricated by the Fox News Network.
The propaganda of Fox and Jindal is just one of too many examples of their radical conservative ideology. Both will say any thing to get recognized and facts are not part of their vocabulary. Jindal will be leaving office in another 12 months and will leave Louisiana in the same sad fiscal shape as George W. Bush left the United States in. His successor will have to pick up the carnage like President Obama had to do.
The Fox News defines free speech as placing blame, division, a lack of being truthful and the fabricator of scandals that do not exist. Fox is the network that relishes its role in decieving its own viewers. They and Jindal are Toxic to American ideals and values.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
The Mayor of Paris is reported to possibly looking at a suit against Fox News for their slander reporting. Other leaders in Europe have criticized Jindal and Fox News for their fairy tale reporting. Neither Fox nor Jindal could identify where the "No Go Zones" were located when asked. Those "No Go Zones" are as elusive as Iraq's WMD and the scandal called Benghazi that was fabricated by the Fox News Network.
The propaganda of Fox and Jindal is just one of too many examples of their radical conservative ideology. Both will say any thing to get recognized and facts are not part of their vocabulary. Jindal will be leaving office in another 12 months and will leave Louisiana in the same sad fiscal shape as George W. Bush left the United States in. His successor will have to pick up the carnage like President Obama had to do.
The Fox News defines free speech as placing blame, division, a lack of being truthful and the fabricator of scandals that do not exist. Fox is the network that relishes its role in decieving its own viewers. They and Jindal are Toxic to American ideals and values.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
The Republican Party Is Consistent: But Unfortunately, Consistently Wrong.
The democratic controlled congress during President Obama's early years in office passed the President's policies that are responsible for the great turn around in the economy, job creation, reducing the federal deficit and lowering the unemployment rate. The democrats answered the call in face of the worst economic recession left by the previous republican administration. The republicans in congress voted against the President's policies and in fact predicted doom and gloom for the economy, job creation and increasing the federal deficit if that legislation was passed by congress. And they were proven wrong.
And if that sounds familiar its because you heard the same doom and gloom predictions when the democratic controlled congress passed President Clinton's economic and deficit reduction plan in 1993. And when the Clinton administration balanced the first federal budget since L.B. Johnson in fiscal 1969, the republicans in congress tried to take credit for that. But Clinton wisely reminded them they had nothing to do with it and did not invite them to the party celebration by the democrats. And then just this month Mitch McConnel, the lead republican obstructionist proclaimed his party was responsible for the economic good news under Obama. McConnell and his party are consistent in their failed predictions. It should be noted that all republicans in the House and Senate voted against President Clinton's plan.
Learning from the past in order to create a better future is not a virture of the republican party. Being so wrong on a consistent basis allows the voters to understand just why republican administrations have very little accomplishments moving the country and the people forward. In fact their only policy in the past 30 plus years has been trickle down economics which has proven not to be a policy at all.
President Obama's economic policies have been a success but republicans will still oppose the President for the next two years regardless what proposals he introduces. Its part of their "stand for nothing" S.O.P.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Why BP Should Be Assessed The Maximum Fine Under The Federal Clean Water Act.
This week will start the trial that will decide BP's penalty for the Macondo well blow out and oil spill. Judge Carl Barbier has decided the evidence supports 3.19 million gallons of oil spilled in the Gulf Of Mexico during the disaster. The Clean Water Act allows a fine for each barrel of oil spilled and in this case the maximum fine would be $13.7 billion. This writer believes BP should be fined the maximum allowed for the pollution it caused for the following reasons.
A) The oil industry's position prior to the spill was that the industry had the equipment and technology available to timely plug an offshore blowout, cap the well and remove any spilled oil in the waters of the Gulf before it reached shore. The fact was that they had no such equipment or technology to timely do any of the above and oil flowed into the Gulf for 87days.
B) 11 Rig workers lost their lives in the blowout and Judge Barbier has ruled that several of BP's actions leading up to the spill were negligent and that each of those negligent acts amounted to "gross negligence" when taking together.
C) The BP blowout was the worst such disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and the oil industry should be sent a message that any such future accidents federal regulations will be enforced to the maximum.
The blowout was a sad chapter in offshore drilling in the Gulf. The disaster went on too long for an industry with over 40 years of experience of drilling in the Gulf who would brag about its offshore technology, safety awareness and ability to operate safely. BP should bite the bullet, pay the fine like a responsible corporation and move on. The Exxon Valdez tanker spill dragged on in litigatin for 20 years after the disaster.
That should not happen concerning the BP situation.
Note: See my previous commentary titled, "The Untold Story of The BP Oil Spill In the Gulf of Mexico" dated 5/6/10
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
A) The oil industry's position prior to the spill was that the industry had the equipment and technology available to timely plug an offshore blowout, cap the well and remove any spilled oil in the waters of the Gulf before it reached shore. The fact was that they had no such equipment or technology to timely do any of the above and oil flowed into the Gulf for 87days.
B) 11 Rig workers lost their lives in the blowout and Judge Barbier has ruled that several of BP's actions leading up to the spill were negligent and that each of those negligent acts amounted to "gross negligence" when taking together.
C) The BP blowout was the worst such disaster in the Gulf of Mexico and the oil industry should be sent a message that any such future accidents federal regulations will be enforced to the maximum.
The blowout was a sad chapter in offshore drilling in the Gulf. The disaster went on too long for an industry with over 40 years of experience of drilling in the Gulf who would brag about its offshore technology, safety awareness and ability to operate safely. BP should bite the bullet, pay the fine like a responsible corporation and move on. The Exxon Valdez tanker spill dragged on in litigatin for 20 years after the disaster.
That should not happen concerning the BP situation.
Note: See my previous commentary titled, "The Untold Story of The BP Oil Spill In the Gulf of Mexico" dated 5/6/10
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Saturday, January 17, 2015
Another First For "PolitiDose"
The chairman of the Republican National Committee confirmed once again what "PolitiDose" has been saying for years that republicans have no accomplishments so they will personally attack any democrat to avoid talking about their own failures. Now comes Reince Priebus, Chairman of the RNC who publically said the republicans will personally attack former President Clinton's personal life if Hillary runs for the democratic nomination in 2016. Its the same old republican con game.
The republican party campaign of 2016 will use personal attacks against any democratic candidate but will be more hateful if Hillary runs because their party fear her the most as an opponent. The republican's hateful attacks against President Obama is only a prelude to the 2016 campaign. This wirter believes if Hillary runs she will be able to take care of herself. Republicans are still burning that they could not defeat Bill Clinton and that he left office with an approval rating so much higher than any republican President. They met the same fate against Barrack Obama. They could not defeat him so they are still trying to destroy his time as President.
The Fox News Network and other conservative news outlets have already begun their attacks so the republican noise machine will stay noisy for the foreseeable future. Its hell when you are a republican and conservative and feel you have to decieve your own supporters with such trash talk. Is there any republican out there who feels he should just stand up and be an American and tell the right wingers in his party to go take a hike? This writer is not holding his breath.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
The republican party campaign of 2016 will use personal attacks against any democratic candidate but will be more hateful if Hillary runs because their party fear her the most as an opponent. The republican's hateful attacks against President Obama is only a prelude to the 2016 campaign. This wirter believes if Hillary runs she will be able to take care of herself. Republicans are still burning that they could not defeat Bill Clinton and that he left office with an approval rating so much higher than any republican President. They met the same fate against Barrack Obama. They could not defeat him so they are still trying to destroy his time as President.
The Fox News Network and other conservative news outlets have already begun their attacks so the republican noise machine will stay noisy for the foreseeable future. Its hell when you are a republican and conservative and feel you have to decieve your own supporters with such trash talk. Is there any republican out there who feels he should just stand up and be an American and tell the right wingers in his party to go take a hike? This writer is not holding his breath.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Friday, January 16, 2015
Mayor Mitch Landrieu: A Serious Public Servant: The Story Continues.
Accomplishments that really matter and make a difference. This writer believes that is the criterion that defines a "serious elected public servant" and sets him apart from those who are just there and always trying to divide.
The Mayor made a committment to end homelessness in New Orleans and is keeping that pledge. The city has partnered with the VA, HANO and non profits to provide housing for those who have been homeless and have made real progress especially with our veterans in getting them off the streets and into housing. As a veteran, I commend the Mayor for his committment. It has been said New Orleans is the very first city to do that. The Mayor is accomplishing this while the city is in need of more revenue.
Landrieu has shown his dedication to reducing the city's crime rate and to upgrade the NOPD and because of his leadership the city is on the move and making much progress. And you will not hear the Mayor attacking other elected officials and trying to place blame. His approach to governing and taking responsibility is in sharp contrast to the republicans failed leadership of personal attacks and blame.
The last paragraph of my commentary noted below reads as follows: The theme of Landrieu's campaign when he was first elected Mayor was ONE TEAM, ONE FIGHT, ONE VOICE AND ONE CITY. The Mayor has been loyal to that theme and has focused on those things that is making it come true. Mayor Mitch Landrieu is a true "serious public servant."
Note: See my commentary dated 2/7/14 titled, Mayor Mitch Landrieu: A Serious Public Servant.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio.
The Mayor made a committment to end homelessness in New Orleans and is keeping that pledge. The city has partnered with the VA, HANO and non profits to provide housing for those who have been homeless and have made real progress especially with our veterans in getting them off the streets and into housing. As a veteran, I commend the Mayor for his committment. It has been said New Orleans is the very first city to do that. The Mayor is accomplishing this while the city is in need of more revenue.
Landrieu has shown his dedication to reducing the city's crime rate and to upgrade the NOPD and because of his leadership the city is on the move and making much progress. And you will not hear the Mayor attacking other elected officials and trying to place blame. His approach to governing and taking responsibility is in sharp contrast to the republicans failed leadership of personal attacks and blame.
The last paragraph of my commentary noted below reads as follows: The theme of Landrieu's campaign when he was first elected Mayor was ONE TEAM, ONE FIGHT, ONE VOICE AND ONE CITY. The Mayor has been loyal to that theme and has focused on those things that is making it come true. Mayor Mitch Landrieu is a true "serious public servant."
Note: See my commentary dated 2/7/14 titled, Mayor Mitch Landrieu: A Serious Public Servant.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio.
Tuesday, January 13, 2015
President Obama And The Paris Terror Attack
President Obama did not attend the peace march rally as a show of solidarity in Paris after the terror attack but U.S. Ambassador to France Jane Hartley did. The republican noise maching as usual criticized the President for not attending. Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, Senators Ted Cruz and Mark Rubio said the President declined to show solidarity, symbolic of the lack of American leadership, we must never hesitate to stand with our allies and Obama should have sent a top official.
The New York Times reported France's President Francois Hollande's head of communications said that Obama did not snubb the march and that Obama supported France in their common struggle against Terrorism. Also that Obama's visit to the French Embassy was a rather exceptional gesture and that Mr. Obama's attentions have been very important to Mr. Hollande.
The Fox News Network tried to plant the seed that Obama's failure to be at the march indicated he was soft on terror. They also questioned the President's leadership. The usual junk that comes from conservative SOP. Like the conservatives in congress Fox can not articulate any accomplishments of the previous administration so they believe going negative on Obama will work . Of course they know most of the European leaders opposed George W. Bush's policies in the middle east, including France who Bush tried to have them contribute troops to Iraq in a war over WMD that did not exist.
The fact of the matter is that President Obama stood solid with France early after the attack on Paris and vowed to stand with France to oppose terror and help bring those responsible to justice. The President's record on fighting the war against those who use terror attacks is very clear. Bin Laden and many of his top people have found that out.
The bottom line is the President's policies have kept our home land safe for 6 years. The tough talking administration of President George W. Bush did not. And that is what really chaps republican conservatives.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
The New York Times reported France's President Francois Hollande's head of communications said that Obama did not snubb the march and that Obama supported France in their common struggle against Terrorism. Also that Obama's visit to the French Embassy was a rather exceptional gesture and that Mr. Obama's attentions have been very important to Mr. Hollande.
The Fox News Network tried to plant the seed that Obama's failure to be at the march indicated he was soft on terror. They also questioned the President's leadership. The usual junk that comes from conservative SOP. Like the conservatives in congress Fox can not articulate any accomplishments of the previous administration so they believe going negative on Obama will work . Of course they know most of the European leaders opposed George W. Bush's policies in the middle east, including France who Bush tried to have them contribute troops to Iraq in a war over WMD that did not exist.
The fact of the matter is that President Obama stood solid with France early after the attack on Paris and vowed to stand with France to oppose terror and help bring those responsible to justice. The President's record on fighting the war against those who use terror attacks is very clear. Bin Laden and many of his top people have found that out.
The bottom line is the President's policies have kept our home land safe for 6 years. The tough talking administration of President George W. Bush did not. And that is what really chaps republican conservatives.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Sunday, January 11, 2015
The U.S. Economy Continues Its Momentum Under The Obama Administration
The U.S. Labor Department reported the economy created 252,000 jobs in December, the 58th straight month of positive job growth. Unemployment fell to 5.6% from the 5.8% rate in November, the lowest unemployment number since 2008. Other good news: Those unemployed more than 6 months fell 27%; Those working part time fell 12%; 50,000 more jobs were created in October and November than was previously reported. 2.95 million jobs were created in the year 2014, the most in a single year since 1999. Another democratic administration was in office at that time. President Bill Clinton.
Over 10 million jobs have been created on the President's watch and more new net jobs in Obama's 6 years in office than was created in President Bush's 8 years in office who ended his two terms with the worst job creation record since the great depression of 1929. Middle class wages are still ahead of inflation but still need to increase on a steady basis to off set the losses that began under the previous republican administration.
The good news on the economy comes on the heels of the good news from the CBO that the budget fiscal year ending 9/30/14 saw a continued reduction of the federal deficit on the President's watch. The republican party in congress could have been part of and party to the progress the country has made on the economy but instead choose the road of doing nothing with the intent to obstruct. The republican controlled House failed a basis test when they refused to even take up the Senate passed bill to repair and rebuild the nation's infrastructure. That has always been supported by both parties in the past because it is an immediate job creator and good for the over all economy.
So what did the republicans in congress do this week after the latest numbers came in on the economy? They started their propaganda push that they are responsible for the great turnaround in the economy. Every one who follows politics know they have no shame. They also have no character or courage. Look for the conservative news media to push the same propaganda.
Its always great to have a democratic administration follow a republican administration in the White House. The change always works out for the better and progress will happen. History has confirmed that and so has "PolitiDose."
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Over 10 million jobs have been created on the President's watch and more new net jobs in Obama's 6 years in office than was created in President Bush's 8 years in office who ended his two terms with the worst job creation record since the great depression of 1929. Middle class wages are still ahead of inflation but still need to increase on a steady basis to off set the losses that began under the previous republican administration.
The good news on the economy comes on the heels of the good news from the CBO that the budget fiscal year ending 9/30/14 saw a continued reduction of the federal deficit on the President's watch. The republican party in congress could have been part of and party to the progress the country has made on the economy but instead choose the road of doing nothing with the intent to obstruct. The republican controlled House failed a basis test when they refused to even take up the Senate passed bill to repair and rebuild the nation's infrastructure. That has always been supported by both parties in the past because it is an immediate job creator and good for the over all economy.
So what did the republicans in congress do this week after the latest numbers came in on the economy? They started their propaganda push that they are responsible for the great turnaround in the economy. Every one who follows politics know they have no shame. They also have no character or courage. Look for the conservative news media to push the same propaganda.
Its always great to have a democratic administration follow a republican administration in the White House. The change always works out for the better and progress will happen. History has confirmed that and so has "PolitiDose."
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Thursday, January 8, 2015
UPDATE: The Federal Budget Deficit For Fiscal Year Ending 9/30/14
The Congressional Budget Office's final report for the federal governments fiscal year ending 9/30/14 shows a federal deficit of $483 billion, down from the previous fiscal year which was $680 billion. A $196 billion decrease and a huge decrease from President George W. Bush's last fiscal year budget deficit which was $1.4 trillion, which is still the largest single year deficit in the history of the United States.
The deficit of $483 billion represents 2.8% as a percentage of the GDP. Bush's $1.4 trillion deficit was 9.8% of the GDP. The CBO also reported total federal revenue of $3.021 trillion up 8.9% from the previous year. Total federal spending was $3.504 trillion, up 1.4% from the previous fiscal year. Total revenue from individual tax was $1.395 trillion up 5.9% and corporate tax was $321 billion up 17.3%
The democratic administration of President Obama continues to reduce the federal deficit and put the country on a parth to balance the federal budget once again as President' s Clinton and Johnson did. Federal spending is also under control on Obama's watch. The President's time in office has reversed the sad chapter of the previous republican administration and republican party's bankrupt policies.
And make no mistake about the republican party who now control both houses of congress. They will make a push to increase federal spending and reduce income tax for the wealthy and corporate America which would put the country back on the path of out of control deficit spending. They will now try to obstruct in a different manner but their goal is the same, increase federal spending so the government won't have the means to fund social security, medicare and medicaid.
And once again it is a democratic administration that is moving the country and its people forward while republicans are still the do nothing party. And if that sounds familiar its because you heard President Truman say that over 50 years ago. Some things never change.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
The deficit of $483 billion represents 2.8% as a percentage of the GDP. Bush's $1.4 trillion deficit was 9.8% of the GDP. The CBO also reported total federal revenue of $3.021 trillion up 8.9% from the previous year. Total federal spending was $3.504 trillion, up 1.4% from the previous fiscal year. Total revenue from individual tax was $1.395 trillion up 5.9% and corporate tax was $321 billion up 17.3%
The democratic administration of President Obama continues to reduce the federal deficit and put the country on a parth to balance the federal budget once again as President' s Clinton and Johnson did. Federal spending is also under control on Obama's watch. The President's time in office has reversed the sad chapter of the previous republican administration and republican party's bankrupt policies.
And make no mistake about the republican party who now control both houses of congress. They will make a push to increase federal spending and reduce income tax for the wealthy and corporate America which would put the country back on the path of out of control deficit spending. They will now try to obstruct in a different manner but their goal is the same, increase federal spending so the government won't have the means to fund social security, medicare and medicaid.
And once again it is a democratic administration that is moving the country and its people forward while republicans are still the do nothing party. And if that sounds familiar its because you heard President Truman say that over 50 years ago. Some things never change.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
MSNBC's "All In" With Chris Hayes Is Out Of The Loop
Hayes, on his show of 1/5/15 asked the question, "Why is the economy where it is today?" (alluding to all the positive developments) He then notes that federal spending under the Obama administration is leveling off. If Hayes knew the history of the economy and federal spending he would know the best of both happen on the watch of Democratic administrations. Or he could simply read "PolitiDose" where this writer has articulated many times over it was going to happen on Obama's watch and the reasons why.
In fact total federal spending at the end of Obama's first fiscal year was down 1.6% from George W. Bush's last fiscal year. Hayes has had several years to find that out but I guess he had other things on his mind other than facts. No republican administration in the past 50 years has reduced year to year federal spending. The Obama administration has accomplished that more than once.
I wrote a commentary as far back as 2009 and predicted how the economy, job creation, reducing the deficit, reducing federal spending and lowering the unemployment rate would happen on Obama's watch because there was a road map known as "precedent" and those predictions have come true. There are other commentaries that explain why the country and its people always do better under democratic administrations in every category.
"PolitiDose" has been in the lead in educating the American people concerning the facts on the economy, job creation and fiscal matters. The republican party and the news media in general have no record of doing so even though they have the resources where they could actually do so. But their world is show business and sound bites and there is no probative value in their pronouncements. And that really says it all.
Note: Commentary dated December 14, 2009 titled, An economic turnaround: Job Creation, and Fiscal Stability, There Is A Precedent
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
In fact total federal spending at the end of Obama's first fiscal year was down 1.6% from George W. Bush's last fiscal year. Hayes has had several years to find that out but I guess he had other things on his mind other than facts. No republican administration in the past 50 years has reduced year to year federal spending. The Obama administration has accomplished that more than once.
I wrote a commentary as far back as 2009 and predicted how the economy, job creation, reducing the deficit, reducing federal spending and lowering the unemployment rate would happen on Obama's watch because there was a road map known as "precedent" and those predictions have come true. There are other commentaries that explain why the country and its people always do better under democratic administrations in every category.
"PolitiDose" has been in the lead in educating the American people concerning the facts on the economy, job creation and fiscal matters. The republican party and the news media in general have no record of doing so even though they have the resources where they could actually do so. But their world is show business and sound bites and there is no probative value in their pronouncements. And that really says it all.
Note: Commentary dated December 14, 2009 titled, An economic turnaround: Job Creation, and Fiscal Stability, There Is A Precedent
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Sunday, January 4, 2015
Part II, The Fall Of The New Orleans Saints: A Look At Why It Happened.
There are a few reasons why the past three seasons revealed a Saint team that lost its so called "swager." First and foremost is bounty gate, a tale that the sports world and especially the New Orleans sports writers failed to tell the true nature of. The true story that was never told is that Sean Payton, head coach, acted irresponsible in allowing bounty gate to happen and was suspended for a full season.
The Saints were the only team that season to play with out its head coach. Two assistant coaches split the head coaching duties that season which was stupid. Continuity was lost and never returned when Payton came back. That irresponsible act on Payton's part affected the players even though they have not admitted it did so. As an organization, the Saints handled the Payton situation like nothing had happened. They should have disciplined Payton instead of giving him a big raise.
Mickey Loomis was also slapped by the NFL for allowing bounty gate to happen and the Times Picayune reported on 3/22/12 NFL commissioner Roger Goddel contended that Payton and Loomis orchestrated a web of lies to divert the attention of league gumshoes. Not a very flattering statement against two people with so much responsibility. The Saints organization failed the team big time. Every one concerned including the players continued to receive large salaries and said they were professionals, and would over come. Yeah, right. It never happened.
After the fiasco of the 2012 losing season New England showed the world how to control the Saints offense with a good defense and as of this writing the team has not been able to adjust when playing the teams with good defenses. Problems between the players and the coaching staff are evident and Payton's arrogance has rubbed off on a number of players. Individual stats have replaced the concept of team and it showed on the field of play.
The genius of Sean Payton (that is how sports writers describe him, not this writer) has worn off, only the arrogance remains. I wrote a commentary dated 3/22/12 titled, "The New Orleans Saints: A Tainted World Champion" and in the last two sentences wrote as follows: The Saints, their coaching staff and the players from this day forward will have an opportunity to demonstrate how well they will handle the future. The final chapter in this sad story will be written at a later date.
Will the ending of the 2014 season be that final chapter or will the Saints over come?
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
The Saints were the only team that season to play with out its head coach. Two assistant coaches split the head coaching duties that season which was stupid. Continuity was lost and never returned when Payton came back. That irresponsible act on Payton's part affected the players even though they have not admitted it did so. As an organization, the Saints handled the Payton situation like nothing had happened. They should have disciplined Payton instead of giving him a big raise.
Mickey Loomis was also slapped by the NFL for allowing bounty gate to happen and the Times Picayune reported on 3/22/12 NFL commissioner Roger Goddel contended that Payton and Loomis orchestrated a web of lies to divert the attention of league gumshoes. Not a very flattering statement against two people with so much responsibility. The Saints organization failed the team big time. Every one concerned including the players continued to receive large salaries and said they were professionals, and would over come. Yeah, right. It never happened.
After the fiasco of the 2012 losing season New England showed the world how to control the Saints offense with a good defense and as of this writing the team has not been able to adjust when playing the teams with good defenses. Problems between the players and the coaching staff are evident and Payton's arrogance has rubbed off on a number of players. Individual stats have replaced the concept of team and it showed on the field of play.
The genius of Sean Payton (that is how sports writers describe him, not this writer) has worn off, only the arrogance remains. I wrote a commentary dated 3/22/12 titled, "The New Orleans Saints: A Tainted World Champion" and in the last two sentences wrote as follows: The Saints, their coaching staff and the players from this day forward will have an opportunity to demonstrate how well they will handle the future. The final chapter in this sad story will be written at a later date.
Will the ending of the 2014 season be that final chapter or will the Saints over come?
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Saturday, January 3, 2015
Times Picayune Sports Writers Ron Higgins and Jeff Duncan: Better Late Than Never
In the Times Picayune of 1/2/15 both writers alluded to the defeat of Alabama in the Sugar Bowl by Ohio State and offered the following: Higgins reported Alabama's loss signals the end of SEC football domination. Jeff Duncan reported the SEC no longer rules the roost. The king is dead. If all that sounds familiar its because you read it here first in "PolitiDose" dated 8/14/14 in a commentary titled, "Will the SEC Continue its dominance?
I also wrote in another commentary that I thought the Saints and Alabama have already had their best years under Payton and Sabin. I said that because of the Saints poor performance the last few years and because the way Alabama lost several big games in the last few years was so unlike Alabama under Sabin. The magic is gone.
The decision to expand the SEC was a bad idea and will continue to dilute the talent and the teams. I also wrote about that in a previous commentary. Another factor is the new young coaches who are spreading out all over the land scape with new ideas on offense that are making the defense cover the full field of play. The defense has not made the necessary adjustments yet and the up tempo of the offense makes it that much worse.
The new BCS play off system took a hit in the Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl with the number 1 and 3 ranked teams loosing and the number 2 and 4 teams winning. The ranking order was a big mistake and the bowls proved that. It is obvious to this writer that the BCS system already needs an adjustment.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
I also wrote in another commentary that I thought the Saints and Alabama have already had their best years under Payton and Sabin. I said that because of the Saints poor performance the last few years and because the way Alabama lost several big games in the last few years was so unlike Alabama under Sabin. The magic is gone.
The decision to expand the SEC was a bad idea and will continue to dilute the talent and the teams. I also wrote about that in a previous commentary. Another factor is the new young coaches who are spreading out all over the land scape with new ideas on offense that are making the defense cover the full field of play. The defense has not made the necessary adjustments yet and the up tempo of the offense makes it that much worse.
The new BCS play off system took a hit in the Sugar Bowl and the Rose Bowl with the number 1 and 3 ranked teams loosing and the number 2 and 4 teams winning. The ranking order was a big mistake and the bowls proved that. It is obvious to this writer that the BCS system already needs an adjustment.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Thursday, January 1, 2015
TO THE READERS OF POLITIDOSE
I have been writing political commentary here in "PolitiDose" since its inception under the pen name of John Lucia. My grandson Patrick started "PolitiDose" during the Presidental campaign of 2008 because he thought there should be a venue for the average person to let his political feelings be know with out the usual filter of the news media.
Patrick, being aware of my interest in politics asked if I would like to contribute political commentary and I have been doing so ever since. After the 2008 election Patrick moved on to other endeavors while I continue to write commentary. I took an interest in politics as a teen ager and my father and grandfather were politically involved writing letters to elected officials, the newspaper, working at the polls and following politics in general.
As we all know, our political system has changed a great deal with money and the special interest people and in my opinion it has not changed for the better. I am a registered democrat and proud of it even though my state is not the strong hold for the party like it once was. I have no confidence in the leaders of the republican party who have taken control of the party since the Newt Gingrich era. In my judgement the party has nothing to offer the country and its people except personal attacks and division.
I try to use my commentary to break thru the myth of republican claims to being superior to democrats and the factual record proves they are not. Some of my commentary is redundant but some times that is what it takes to rebut the constant republican noise machine. I also write about the factual record of the democratic party and their accomplishments for the country and its people. The general news media has punted on that and seem to be satisfied to report non facts on important matters. My commentary covers opinions that I have on certain matters and I believe important such as opening up relations with Cuba, the transfer of wealth from the middle class to the wealthy and other issues.
It is my hope that the readers of "PolitiDose" enjoy my commentary and that they feel like they have gained knowledge and facts about the political parties they may not have realized before. I also hope my readers compare what they read here with other political commentary so they can be exposed to political views outside the regular news media and the cable news networks. Although "PolitiDose" is small compared to the majority of other commentary blogs, readers may comment if they so desire.
I would like to take this time to thank everyone who logs onto and reads "PolitiDose on a regular basis. The traffic has been healthy and growing and I hope to continue to earn your trust and respect. Your continued support is greatly appreciated. All future commentary will be written under my sur-name.
Yours truly and Happy New Years to All
Yours truly,
Joseph J. Lorio, Sr.
Louisiana's U.S. Representative Steve Scalise: An Apology, A Mistake and a Regret
Scalise, like many other elected officials who get caught, uttered those words 12 years after the fact of speaking at a conference of the European-American Unity and Rights organization known as EURO. David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan member led and was the founder of EURO that has been described as a white nationalists and hate organization.
Scalise said he had no knowledge of the nature of EURO and had not vetted the group. The question is how could any one in Louisiana, especially a politician not know about David Duke's organization? Also, when did Scalise find out the true nature of EURO? Was it just this week when the story broke. Was it some time before and he just remained silent? Those who know Scalise discribe him as a sharp politician.
Hate is expressed in different ways other than through a group or organization. The conservative right wing of the republic party in congress has said many hateful things about President Obama and his policies since the first day he took office and continue to do so. Their personal attacks against the President saying the ACA contained "Death Panels" was a hateful thing to do. Other conservatives even said hateful things towards the President's daughters.
The conservative right wing of the republican party in congress said hateful things about President Clinton and his wife. They even hatefully impeached the President when there was no cause. They even knew the Senate led by Chief Justice of the Supreme Court at the time could not convict the President because he committed no impeachable offense. The President was also called a "slimeball" and other hateful names. Is there any one out there that remembers that? The so called moderates in the republican party were silent and let the right wingers have their way.
The Fox News Network attacks President Obama in a hateful way almost every day. Conservative journalists are known to do the same thing. Doing and saying hateful things divide the country and its people and division is a trade mark of the republican party. Those organizaions and groups who were responsible for the hateful signs and hand outs put up in Dallas on November 22,1963 concerning President Kennedy's visit have been described as conservative right wingers. One hand out containing a picture of the President had the caption, "Wanted for Treason." Can it get any more hateful than that?
Hate and hateful talk does not only originate with organizations and groups out side of our political system. It also takes place in our political system by those who think of themselves as elite and superior. And sadly there is a long record of proof.
This commentary written by John Lucia
Scalise said he had no knowledge of the nature of EURO and had not vetted the group. The question is how could any one in Louisiana, especially a politician not know about David Duke's organization? Also, when did Scalise find out the true nature of EURO? Was it just this week when the story broke. Was it some time before and he just remained silent? Those who know Scalise discribe him as a sharp politician.
Hate is expressed in different ways other than through a group or organization. The conservative right wing of the republic party in congress has said many hateful things about President Obama and his policies since the first day he took office and continue to do so. Their personal attacks against the President saying the ACA contained "Death Panels" was a hateful thing to do. Other conservatives even said hateful things towards the President's daughters.
The conservative right wing of the republican party in congress said hateful things about President Clinton and his wife. They even hatefully impeached the President when there was no cause. They even knew the Senate led by Chief Justice of the Supreme Court at the time could not convict the President because he committed no impeachable offense. The President was also called a "slimeball" and other hateful names. Is there any one out there that remembers that? The so called moderates in the republican party were silent and let the right wingers have their way.
The Fox News Network attacks President Obama in a hateful way almost every day. Conservative journalists are known to do the same thing. Doing and saying hateful things divide the country and its people and division is a trade mark of the republican party. Those organizaions and groups who were responsible for the hateful signs and hand outs put up in Dallas on November 22,1963 concerning President Kennedy's visit have been described as conservative right wingers. One hand out containing a picture of the President had the caption, "Wanted for Treason." Can it get any more hateful than that?
Hate and hateful talk does not only originate with organizations and groups out side of our political system. It also takes place in our political system by those who think of themselves as elite and superior. And sadly there is a long record of proof.
This commentary written by John Lucia
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)