When you look at Democrats who last time were 80% of the turnout, Hillary wins with that group by 6%, 33 to 27 for Obama and 25 for Edwards. And as David Yepsen points out, had their pollsters used the 2004 turnout model, Hillary would lead by 29 to 27, figures in line with the other polls.
The Des Moines Register Poll this time has 40% independent voters and 5% GOP voters in the poll when past independent participation has been 15% in 2000 and 19% in 2004, and the GOP has generally made up 1% of the vote. So they are depicting an unprecedented departure from historically established turnout patterns in the caucus. Under their model, only 55% of the caucus goers would be Democrats.
So we do not see this poll as accurately reflecting the trends we are seeing in other polls, on our nightly canvasses or in our own polls, and voters should understand this is a very close race, and that their participation on caucus night could make all of the difference."
So, while the DMR poll certainly has to be taken into account, it should not be taken to mean that this race is all but over, with Obama being the victor, as many have exclaimed. The DMR poll, although historically accurate, has factored in some rather unknown and unprecedented variables. That's why the poll must be analyzed in context with other historically accurate and recent polling.
Bottom Line: This race is still extremely close and anyone of the top three Democrats could win the Iowa caucus and hence the nomination.
No comments :
Post a Comment