It doesn't speak fully. Just like Hillary, it leaves out key details, such as Hillary's own words before the primaries in Michigan and Florida and her signature on the pledge in 2007 not to seat the delegates. What's changed? Oh yeah, she's not supposed to have been behind at this point. She was supposed to have had the nomination locked up after Super Tuesday.
April 4, 2008 Clinton Superdelegates are Easing to Obama (Brent Budowsky) @ 4:07 pm Behind the scenes there is private movement among some key superdelegates who support Clinton but recognize the inevitable. Public comments are starting to seep out, making the suggestion that if Hillary is behind in elected delegates and popular vote they reserve the right to switch to Obama.
This trend is more pronounced privately than publicly. I do not expect major switches before Pennsylvania, at least, but I do expect a growing line of public comments dropping more hints, as we have seen in recent days.
Stay tuned. Don’t believe everything you hear on cable television. The more Clinton threatens to take a divisive fight to the convention, the more superdelegates pull away privately. Obama’s $40 million money take for March was hugely important and well understood by the supers.
Obama now leads in elected delegates, popular vote, number of states won and fundraising by a large margin, and the superdelegate move to Obama has been almost 100 percent and huge over the last several weeks. Stay tuned — this is much closer to over than the pundits suggest.
The fact is Obama's lead in the popular vote is not by a large margin and if Michigan and Florida are counted his lead in the popular vote is minimal. Anonymous is the one who must be listening to the cable news journalists.
If's an awfully big word!! Even "IF", would Hillary be close in popular vote if Obama had been on the ballot in Michigan? Doubtful!! Remember that he got "0", ZERO votes in Michigan, and even counting Michigan he'd still be leading in popular vote!! Come on!!! Even not contesting one of the largest states to Hillary and he'd still be leading in popular vote!! What's that say about who America wants?
4 comments :
It doesn't speak fully. Just like Hillary, it leaves out key details, such as Hillary's own words before the primaries in Michigan and Florida and her signature on the pledge in 2007 not to seat the delegates. What's changed? Oh yeah, she's not supposed to have been behind at this point. She was supposed to have had the nomination locked up after Super Tuesday.
April 4, 2008
Clinton Superdelegates are Easing to Obama (Brent Budowsky)
@ 4:07 pm
Behind the scenes there is private movement among some key superdelegates who support Clinton but recognize the inevitable. Public comments are starting to seep out, making the suggestion that if Hillary is behind in elected delegates and popular vote they reserve the right to switch to Obama.
This trend is more pronounced privately than publicly. I do not expect major switches before Pennsylvania, at least, but I do expect a growing line of public comments dropping more hints, as we have seen in recent days.
Stay tuned. Don’t believe everything you hear on cable television. The more Clinton threatens to take a divisive fight to the convention, the more superdelegates pull away privately. Obama’s $40 million money take for March was hugely important and well understood by the supers.
Obama now leads in elected delegates, popular vote, number of states won and fundraising by a large margin, and the superdelegate move to Obama has been almost 100 percent and huge over the last several weeks. Stay tuned — this is much closer to over than the pundits suggest.
http://pundits.thehill.com/2008/04/04/clinton-superdelegates-are-easing-to-obama/
The fact is Obama's lead in the popular vote is not by a large margin and if Michigan and Florida are counted his lead in the popular vote is minimal. Anonymous is the one who must be listening to the cable news journalists.
If's an awfully big word!! Even "IF", would Hillary be close in popular vote if Obama had been on the ballot in Michigan? Doubtful!! Remember that he got "0", ZERO votes in Michigan, and even counting Michigan he'd still be leading in popular vote!! Come on!!! Even not contesting one of the largest states to Hillary and he'd still be leading in popular vote!! What's that say about who America wants?
Post a Comment