Maddow's Wednesday night show started off with a long winded story about past Presidential campaigns and conventions leading up to the statement that the democratic party today suffers from acrimony and division because of Senator Sanders supporters protest actions at the Nevada state democratic convention recently and some statements made by Sanders himself.
It was the lead story for a change instead of Trump who the network has had a 10 month love affair with almost every night. Maddow tried to paint her acrimony remark as being the top story. Of course it was not but when air time has to be filled and the host lacks a real story, that is when the fairy tale starts.
MSNBC has a long history of giving Bernie Sanders a lot of air time and treating him like a democrat which he is not. Does Maddow's comment mean that the network will now switch its attention to the democratic candidates and try to promote a "all is not well" in the democratic party? The party will be UNITED with or without Sanders if Clinton is the nominee. A lot will change after the conventions because that is when it will become one on one for the general election.
That is when the voters start paying real attention. Trump is well aware that Clinton will be no push over if she is the democratic nominee and that she can take care of herself. That is why Trump wants to see Sanders become a third party candidate to dilute the democratic vote. Rachel and MSNBC has let that story slip by.
Trump's announcement of the names of a possible VP choice and the names of candidates for the Supreme Court is an attempt to keep the spotlight on himself and to continue the free coverage by the news media. This writer sees the cracks starting to show up in Trump's campaign and the positions he has taken so far and once the general election starts and its one on one Trump will not be such a attractive candidate any longer.
The democratic party and their nominee will put up a UNITED front against Trump and his do nothing party and expose both for what they really are, the party of Corporate America who want to dominate the country's political system with division, lies, ongoing wars, extremism, religious bigotry and third world wages for working Americans.
No matter how you cut it, MSNBC is not the place for politics and neither is Donald Trump.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Thursday, May 19, 2016
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Food For Thought On The Presidential Election
During elections there are a lot of words thrown around by the news media, various pundits and the voters (those who vote and those who do not). The words are used to try and build a story and influence the election. This years Presidential election has produced the word "establishment" to try and convey the message that so called "established candidates" are out of favor with the voting public. But nothing could be farther from the truth.
There are three Presidential candidates left in the race, Sanders, Trump and Clinton. After the conventions there will be only two. Bernie Sanders represents the "establishment" because he has been a member of congress for over 25 years. Donald Trump represents the "establishment" longer that anyone else, in fact all of his working life he has represented the "establishment" of corporate America. Hillary Clinton has represented the "establishment" serving in congress as a U.S. Senator for 8 years. She also served in the appointed job of Secretary of State for 4 years.
We know corporate America which Trump is part of give campaign contributions (in the millions of dollars) to elected officials because they are looking for special favors. Trump admitted that in the debates. If corporate America had a policy of not giving campaign contributions to elected officials then those elected officials would be more responsible to the needs of the country and the people they serve. So it is corporate America that keeps the political process corrupted. Cut off the dogs tail and it won't wiggle. Trump now says he would like to raise $1 billion for the general election and will seek it from PAC"s and corporate America. This is in conflict with his position all through the primaries when he said his campaign would be self funded.
Sanders says he receives no campaign contributions from PAC's or corporate America. He is a registered independent and would be donors probably believe he could not help them in congress. As a Presidential candidate he has raised enough money from independent people that has allowed him to compete. Sanders whole campaign has been about how money has corrupted the political system and that is why the 1% are the only ones advancing financially.
As a U.S. Senator for 8 years Hillary Clinton received campaign contributions from corporate America and individuals and is doing the same today along with PAC groups in her Presidential campaign. In 2013 she was out of public office and received speaking fees from various corporate America groups that has been the subject of comments by her opponents who would like her to make the transcripts of those speeches public. Something that has never been required in the past for any Presidential candidate.
So, here we have 3 remaining Presidential candidates and one who will become President who all represent the "establishment" and Hillary having the least involvement. Does that sound like the voters are against an "establishment" candidate? That won't wash and one can bet those voters are the same voters who have voted over and over for the same "establishment" members of congress who have been there for so many years.
The use of the word "establishment" is over played in this Presidential campaign and part of its use is to promote some one outside of politics like Trump. But Trump now wants to be in the political process and rub elbows with our political system. Since the next President will come from the "establishment" this writer would like to see the candidate come from the political "establishment" rather than the "establishment" of corporate America and for obvious reasons.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
There are three Presidential candidates left in the race, Sanders, Trump and Clinton. After the conventions there will be only two. Bernie Sanders represents the "establishment" because he has been a member of congress for over 25 years. Donald Trump represents the "establishment" longer that anyone else, in fact all of his working life he has represented the "establishment" of corporate America. Hillary Clinton has represented the "establishment" serving in congress as a U.S. Senator for 8 years. She also served in the appointed job of Secretary of State for 4 years.
We know corporate America which Trump is part of give campaign contributions (in the millions of dollars) to elected officials because they are looking for special favors. Trump admitted that in the debates. If corporate America had a policy of not giving campaign contributions to elected officials then those elected officials would be more responsible to the needs of the country and the people they serve. So it is corporate America that keeps the political process corrupted. Cut off the dogs tail and it won't wiggle. Trump now says he would like to raise $1 billion for the general election and will seek it from PAC"s and corporate America. This is in conflict with his position all through the primaries when he said his campaign would be self funded.
Sanders says he receives no campaign contributions from PAC's or corporate America. He is a registered independent and would be donors probably believe he could not help them in congress. As a Presidential candidate he has raised enough money from independent people that has allowed him to compete. Sanders whole campaign has been about how money has corrupted the political system and that is why the 1% are the only ones advancing financially.
As a U.S. Senator for 8 years Hillary Clinton received campaign contributions from corporate America and individuals and is doing the same today along with PAC groups in her Presidential campaign. In 2013 she was out of public office and received speaking fees from various corporate America groups that has been the subject of comments by her opponents who would like her to make the transcripts of those speeches public. Something that has never been required in the past for any Presidential candidate.
So, here we have 3 remaining Presidential candidates and one who will become President who all represent the "establishment" and Hillary having the least involvement. Does that sound like the voters are against an "establishment" candidate? That won't wash and one can bet those voters are the same voters who have voted over and over for the same "establishment" members of congress who have been there for so many years.
The use of the word "establishment" is over played in this Presidential campaign and part of its use is to promote some one outside of politics like Trump. But Trump now wants to be in the political process and rub elbows with our political system. Since the next President will come from the "establishment" this writer would like to see the candidate come from the political "establishment" rather than the "establishment" of corporate America and for obvious reasons.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Monday, May 16, 2016
America Does Not Win Anymore: Authored By Donald Trump
Like the republican party and the Fox News Network, Trump will push anything to try and cast doubt on the country and its government, especially in an election year. America and its government are always the bad guys even though people represent both. Trump used this remark because he is out of touch himself with what America is all about.
The remark was used by Trump on more than one occasion concerning the President's policy on fighting ISIS. It is a cheap shot on every man and women who ever wore the uniform of their country because they are America along with all citizens. Our men and women in uniform are all winners because they go where ever the President and Commander in Chief orders them to go. They do their jobs, serve their country well, never complain and obey the Commander in Chief even when they are sent off to a unnecessary war in Iraq over WMD that did not exist.
That war took the lives of over 4400 American military personnel and wounded over 30,000, some so severely they will never walk again without assistance of some kind. And many who returned wounded never received the proper care. Yes, America does win because all our men and women who wore the uniform of their country are Americans and they are winners. Of course, Donald Trump knows nothing about that.
There are a lot of Donald Trumps in this world who like to tear down America because they themselves feel so inadequate. They like to talk tough but never walk the talk. The American people will continue to win and therefore so will America. Donald Trump may be a billionaire but he lacks character, courage and the wisdom to understand that America and its people win every day.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
The remark was used by Trump on more than one occasion concerning the President's policy on fighting ISIS. It is a cheap shot on every man and women who ever wore the uniform of their country because they are America along with all citizens. Our men and women in uniform are all winners because they go where ever the President and Commander in Chief orders them to go. They do their jobs, serve their country well, never complain and obey the Commander in Chief even when they are sent off to a unnecessary war in Iraq over WMD that did not exist.
That war took the lives of over 4400 American military personnel and wounded over 30,000, some so severely they will never walk again without assistance of some kind. And many who returned wounded never received the proper care. Yes, America does win because all our men and women who wore the uniform of their country are Americans and they are winners. Of course, Donald Trump knows nothing about that.
There are a lot of Donald Trumps in this world who like to tear down America because they themselves feel so inadequate. They like to talk tough but never walk the talk. The American people will continue to win and therefore so will America. Donald Trump may be a billionaire but he lacks character, courage and the wisdom to understand that America and its people win every day.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Sunday, May 15, 2016
Foreign Policy Requires Leadership and Knowledge: Some Leaders Have It, Some Do Not: Trump Seeks It But Does Not Understand It.
Donald Trump said he would not take using the bomb (nuclear) against ISIS off the table. George W. Bush could not find Bin Laden in the seven years and 9 months that passed after the attack on 9/11 and not even in the invasion of Afghanistan a month after the attack. How many members of ISIS would be killed in a nuclear attack and how many innocent men, women and children would be killed? Common sense tells this writer the innocent would suffer the burden and the devastation. There would be more refugees in the middle east from that one event than what is taking place now with the civil war in Syria.
Israel's prime minister Netanyahu appeared before the U.S. congress almost two years ago with charts and told congress and the world Iran would have a nuclear weapon in six months. Of course it never happened and was used as a scare tactic to scuttle President Obama's treaty with our allies and Iran to curb that country's nuclear ambitions. That treaty is now working and Trump said as President he would end or redo the treaty. So here we have Iran who has never threatened to use nuclear weapons or admitted having a nuclear weapons program and Trump who is talking about the possibility of using the bomb in the middle east.
Trump said he would build a wall on the U.S.'s southern border with Mexico and make that country pay for it. Mexico said don't hold your breath because they would not pay for the wall. Trump then back tracked and said immigrants in the U.S. who send money back to Mexico would be banned from doing so and that would be a loss of revenue for Mexico.
Trumps position of a ban on Muslim's entering the U.S. was quickly rebutted by London's mayor who is a Muslim and Trump backed down again and said there would be exemptions. He backed down once again and said the ban was only a suggestion.
Trump also said he would renegotiate the treaties with our allies. Of course that can only happen if our allies agree and in many cases the treaties are with multiple allies such as NATO. This goes along with his statement of America to go it alone like the failed policy of President George W. Bush.
The United States and our allies have worked for many years to stop the spread of Nuclear weapons and now we have Trump talking about nuclear weapons use in the middle east and urging S. Korea and Japan to develop their own nuclear weapons program so they can defend themselves. That is a foreign policy based on madness.
Trump's loose talk shows his lack of knowledge and leadership on the subject and a failed grasp of what the President and Commander in Chief's responsibilities are in foreign policy. His flip flopping indicates a person who is not confident and speaks before he understands the foolishness of his words. And when one understands Trump does not think American is a great country, that is all the more reason the American people should be alarmed.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Israel's prime minister Netanyahu appeared before the U.S. congress almost two years ago with charts and told congress and the world Iran would have a nuclear weapon in six months. Of course it never happened and was used as a scare tactic to scuttle President Obama's treaty with our allies and Iran to curb that country's nuclear ambitions. That treaty is now working and Trump said as President he would end or redo the treaty. So here we have Iran who has never threatened to use nuclear weapons or admitted having a nuclear weapons program and Trump who is talking about the possibility of using the bomb in the middle east.
Trump said he would build a wall on the U.S.'s southern border with Mexico and make that country pay for it. Mexico said don't hold your breath because they would not pay for the wall. Trump then back tracked and said immigrants in the U.S. who send money back to Mexico would be banned from doing so and that would be a loss of revenue for Mexico.
Trumps position of a ban on Muslim's entering the U.S. was quickly rebutted by London's mayor who is a Muslim and Trump backed down again and said there would be exemptions. He backed down once again and said the ban was only a suggestion.
Trump also said he would renegotiate the treaties with our allies. Of course that can only happen if our allies agree and in many cases the treaties are with multiple allies such as NATO. This goes along with his statement of America to go it alone like the failed policy of President George W. Bush.
The United States and our allies have worked for many years to stop the spread of Nuclear weapons and now we have Trump talking about nuclear weapons use in the middle east and urging S. Korea and Japan to develop their own nuclear weapons program so they can defend themselves. That is a foreign policy based on madness.
Trump's loose talk shows his lack of knowledge and leadership on the subject and a failed grasp of what the President and Commander in Chief's responsibilities are in foreign policy. His flip flopping indicates a person who is not confident and speaks before he understands the foolishness of his words. And when one understands Trump does not think American is a great country, that is all the more reason the American people should be alarmed.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Friday, May 13, 2016
April Was Another Good Month For Job Creation
The U.S. Labor Department announced that the economy created 160,000 jobs April and that the unemployment rate held steady at 5%. It was the 74th straight month of positive job growth. Some business groups were forecasting 190,000 plus jobs. The President's policies are still working and the economy and job creation would be even better if the republican controlled congress would approve the President's plan for the repairs to the nations infrastructure, roads, bridges and etc.
In the past that expenditure was always bipartisan and both parties worked to pass legislation to take care of the problem. It is a project that puts people to work quickly with good paying jobs. But today's republican party is the do nothing party of obstruction who wants nothing to do with progress under a democratic administration. They would like to see the economy tank in this election year and use that as a campaign issue. It tell how far the republican party is willing to stoop to sabotage the President and the people. A democratic controlled congress would have passed that legislation in a New York second. And they say a New York second is the fastest second in the world.
Despite the republican party's opposition, President Obama will leave office with a better economy than he inherited, a better job creation record than both President Bush 41 and Bush 43 combined, a better record on reducing deficit spending, a lower unemployment rate than when he took office, brought Bin Laden and a host of ISIS leaders to justice, a safer America and a host of other positive accomplishments.
The previous republican administration failed to have a positive impact on any of those issues and that is why the republican party want to see President Obama and his administration to fail.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
In the past that expenditure was always bipartisan and both parties worked to pass legislation to take care of the problem. It is a project that puts people to work quickly with good paying jobs. But today's republican party is the do nothing party of obstruction who wants nothing to do with progress under a democratic administration. They would like to see the economy tank in this election year and use that as a campaign issue. It tell how far the republican party is willing to stoop to sabotage the President and the people. A democratic controlled congress would have passed that legislation in a New York second. And they say a New York second is the fastest second in the world.
Despite the republican party's opposition, President Obama will leave office with a better economy than he inherited, a better job creation record than both President Bush 41 and Bush 43 combined, a better record on reducing deficit spending, a lower unemployment rate than when he took office, brought Bin Laden and a host of ISIS leaders to justice, a safer America and a host of other positive accomplishments.
The previous republican administration failed to have a positive impact on any of those issues and that is why the republican party want to see President Obama and his administration to fail.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Another First For PolitiDose and Another Johnny Come Lately Article By The Huffington Post
The Huffington Post recent story concerning President Obama and how he has not been given credit for the advancement the country has made on his watch on the economy, and other issues. Well, the question really should be how come the Huffington Post and the rest of the news media took so long to be out of the loop and so late in their reporting of the Administration's success.
The answer comes down to the Huffington Post and the news media are more interested in reporting the negative comments of the moment and the hype that goes along with filling up the news cycle. But there is one news outlet that actually predicted the turn around in the economy, job creation, lower unemployment and reduced federal spending in December of 2009, over 6 years ago and has continued to point out the good news on the recovery and etc.,on a regular basis ever since that December commentary. And the news venue is "PolitiDose" your daily dose of political commentary. "PolitiDose" has been at the forefront in reporting the success of the Obama administration.
Its ironic that the same day the Huffington Post carried the story Donald Trump was their lead story on 5 or 6 different articles. They and the other news media have lots of time for the likes of Trump. The good things that happen in our country take a back seat with an out of control news media whose first obligation should be to keep the American people informed. 'PolitiDose" has filled that void time and time again.
"PolitiDose" will continue to make commentary on those issues that matter to the people and make a difference. The Johnny comes lately will continue to show a lack of respect for their profession and their disdain for the truth.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
See commentary dated December 14, 2009 titled "An Economic Turn Around: Job Creation and Fiscal Stability: There Is A Precedent.
The answer comes down to the Huffington Post and the news media are more interested in reporting the negative comments of the moment and the hype that goes along with filling up the news cycle. But there is one news outlet that actually predicted the turn around in the economy, job creation, lower unemployment and reduced federal spending in December of 2009, over 6 years ago and has continued to point out the good news on the recovery and etc.,on a regular basis ever since that December commentary. And the news venue is "PolitiDose" your daily dose of political commentary. "PolitiDose" has been at the forefront in reporting the success of the Obama administration.
Its ironic that the same day the Huffington Post carried the story Donald Trump was their lead story on 5 or 6 different articles. They and the other news media have lots of time for the likes of Trump. The good things that happen in our country take a back seat with an out of control news media whose first obligation should be to keep the American people informed. 'PolitiDose" has filled that void time and time again.
"PolitiDose" will continue to make commentary on those issues that matter to the people and make a difference. The Johnny comes lately will continue to show a lack of respect for their profession and their disdain for the truth.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
See commentary dated December 14, 2009 titled "An Economic Turn Around: Job Creation and Fiscal Stability: There Is A Precedent.
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders Are Running A Credible and Sensible Presidential Campaign For The Country and The American People
What a difference when watching Clinton and Sanders campaign speeches compared to their opponent's party speeches. With Clinton and Sanders talking about the issues that matter and make a difference it is like night and day. The democratic candidates campaign on inclusion, something the Constitution and Bill of Rights stand for. The message is to bring the country together and not tear it down.
Clinton and Sanders differ on several issues but they are small because both understand the problems and have real policy solutions. Its not tough talk and shooting ones mouth off just to see where it splatters all over the news media. They have a healthy respect for public service and the people's right to know where they stand on the issues. They do not have to change their positions daily.
The republican party's presumptive Presidential nominee has been all over the landscape with his rhetoric and just in the past few days can not explain his tax plan because it is based on deception and different than the tax plan he laid out earlier in the campaign. Its like his confused position on the minimum wage which he can not nail down.
Clinton and Sanders are a calming voice at a much needed time in the campaign with only six and a half months go go until the November elections. This writer believes it is easy to identify the serious Presidential candidates, and they are both running for the democratic party's Presidential nomination.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Clinton and Sanders differ on several issues but they are small because both understand the problems and have real policy solutions. Its not tough talk and shooting ones mouth off just to see where it splatters all over the news media. They have a healthy respect for public service and the people's right to know where they stand on the issues. They do not have to change their positions daily.
The republican party's presumptive Presidential nominee has been all over the landscape with his rhetoric and just in the past few days can not explain his tax plan because it is based on deception and different than the tax plan he laid out earlier in the campaign. Its like his confused position on the minimum wage which he can not nail down.
Clinton and Sanders are a calming voice at a much needed time in the campaign with only six and a half months go go until the November elections. This writer believes it is easy to identify the serious Presidential candidates, and they are both running for the democratic party's Presidential nomination.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Saturday, May 7, 2016
The Republican Party Will Back Donald Trump
There will continue to be some individual republicans who will not support Donald Trump as the party's nominee but the republican party itself will. A lot of the noise about abandoning Trump by the party is just that, noise. The boom has been lowered by the republican base in the primaries, they will not support any other of the 16 challengers.
The announcement that former President George W. Bush would not be attending the republican convention or commenting any more on the 2016 election is not a big deal and is really a no brainer. During the republican debates and on the campaign trail the candidates would not even mention Bush's name because they had nothing positive to mention about his administration. Bush being at the convention would just remind the viewing audience about the failures of his administration.
Speaker of the U.S. House Paul Ryan said he is not ready to endorse Trump but this writer thinks he will. It is part of what is taking place inside the republican party. Ryan and his party who control both houses of congress has been the least productive congress in the past 50 years. They want to win back the White House so bad to try again and implement their extreme agenda they would support Satan.
The best outcome for the GOP after the 2016 elections is a big democratic win and the emergence of a new republican party where conservatism becomes a virtue and ideology becomes a thing of the past. The reckless behavior of the GOP, especially during the Obama administration has been self destructive and a insult to the country and its people who deserve better. Those republicans serving in congress and others in the party who now say they will not support Trump had a hand in the making of Donald Trump using many of the same tactics in the past and are still doing so against President Obama.
America's political system is not perfect and never will be because humankind lacks perfection, but those who seek election to public service have a responsibility and obligation to put the country and the people's needs first and govern accordingly. Any thing less is unacceptable and that is where the GOP stands today.
This commentary was written by Joe Lorio
The announcement that former President George W. Bush would not be attending the republican convention or commenting any more on the 2016 election is not a big deal and is really a no brainer. During the republican debates and on the campaign trail the candidates would not even mention Bush's name because they had nothing positive to mention about his administration. Bush being at the convention would just remind the viewing audience about the failures of his administration.
Speaker of the U.S. House Paul Ryan said he is not ready to endorse Trump but this writer thinks he will. It is part of what is taking place inside the republican party. Ryan and his party who control both houses of congress has been the least productive congress in the past 50 years. They want to win back the White House so bad to try again and implement their extreme agenda they would support Satan.
The best outcome for the GOP after the 2016 elections is a big democratic win and the emergence of a new republican party where conservatism becomes a virtue and ideology becomes a thing of the past. The reckless behavior of the GOP, especially during the Obama administration has been self destructive and a insult to the country and its people who deserve better. Those republicans serving in congress and others in the party who now say they will not support Trump had a hand in the making of Donald Trump using many of the same tactics in the past and are still doing so against President Obama.
America's political system is not perfect and never will be because humankind lacks perfection, but those who seek election to public service have a responsibility and obligation to put the country and the people's needs first and govern accordingly. Any thing less is unacceptable and that is where the GOP stands today.
This commentary was written by Joe Lorio
Friday, May 6, 2016
Louisiana's State Parks Now Joins The News Of Financial Neglect
According to a Times Picayune article of 5/1 by staff writer Greg LaRose Lt. Governor Billy Nungesser suggest that Louisiana sell naming rights to the state parks because those recreation sites are strapped for cash. Visitation at Louisiana's state parks are up and Nungesser would like to see some of the parks upgraded to handle more overnight visitors. But Louisiana does not have any revenue designated for the state park system and user fees do not provide enough revenue for upkeep, expansion and etc.
This problem is related to the state's budget and joins a list of other issues that are not funded to meet needed demand. That should sound familiar to every one. Selling naming rights is one aspect of privatizing state services. Jindal did that with several hospitals and we are finding out in the last several weeks it has cost the state more than was projected. It is the easy way out for elected officials so they do not have to make the hard choices.
The article points out that Bobby Jindal pulled $54 million from state parks in his last 5 years in office according to Nungesser and here is what Nungesser said about that. I WOULD HAVE BEEN FIST FIGHTING WITH BOBBY IN THE FRONT YARD OF THE GOVERNORS MANSION TO RETAIN THAT MONEY. Well during that same 5 year period, Nungesser was President of Plaquemine Parish so he had a good opportunity to have that fist fight with Bobby but he choose not too. So much for tough talk. Nungesser is the same loud mouth who blamed President Obama for the actions he took after the BP Oil spill. But, unlike Louisiana officials who have let the Oil industry in Louisiana off the hook for their damage to the environment for the past 40 plus years, Obama held BP accountable.
Some states like Illinois and Texas charges fees and taxes on some sporting goods purchase that goes to operate its state parks. In other words, they have designated revenue to count on for their state parks while Louisiana does not. The state parks issue is just another example how Louisiana operates without priorities and does not have a revenue base for recurring expenses, something "PolitiDose" has pointed out in previous commentary.
More and more it becomes evident how the $8 billion in tax breaks, exemptions, credits and etc., for business has corrupted Louisiana's fiscal house and budgetary process and all because the state legislature have failed to do their job of taking care of the people's business and the state itself. That is one reason Governor Edwards has told the legislature to focus on those tax exemptions and etc., as a way for the state to increase its revenue base. Its called tax fairness.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Tuesday, May 3, 2016
Hillary Clinton Is Right: The Country Needs A President That Will Build On and Extend President Obama's Successful Policy and Achievements.
President Obama's policies reversed the economic melt down and record job losses of the previous republican administration, reduced deficit spending that was at record levels and reduced the unemployment rate to 5%. The ACA was passed that reduced the uninsured rolls by millions. The increase in total federal spending under Obama has been much less than under President George W. Bush, his father and the Reagan administration. And the republican's in congress opposed all the President's economic plans that worked. In other words the republican party had nothing to do with the economic recovery.
The President's policies reduced the country's military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan even though the republicans wanted our military to have an active combat role there. As a result of the President's policies our military are not serving 4 or 5 tours in the middle east any more and our military deaths have declined significantly. The country's policy in the middle east is the right one despite the negative attitude of the republican party and its Presidential candidates. The U.S. is working once again with our allies in the region, something that was lacking in the previous administration.
Clinton is the best candidate to build on those successful policies, have them produce better results for the average American and move the country forward in the right direction. The republican noise machine are still trying to sell the people their same old failed policies of trickle down economics and their leading Presidential candidate Donald Trump in a so called foreign policy speech last week was pathetic. It was a repeat of George W. Bush's policy of go it alone against everyone and so called tough talk with no bite.
For the record, there has been no republican administration that created as many new jobs as the democratic administration it followed in the last 50 years. There has been no republican administration that left office with a smaller deficit than when they took office in the last 50 years. The last republican President to balance the federal budget was Dwight Eisenhower in 1960. There has been no republican administration where the unemployment rate stayed below or where it was when they took office during their term in office in the last 50 years. There has been no republican administration where total federal spending decreased year to year in the last 50 years. President George W. Bush had the worst job creation record since the great depression after his first 4 years in office and also after his full 8 years in office.
But the record does show that the democratic administrations of Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama did accomplish a combination of all those things the republican administrations of Nixon-Ford, Reagan, Bush 41 and Bush 43 never did. More Americans have been killed in terrorists attacks at home and abroad on the republican watch while those administrations were trying to talk tough. Democratic administrations have kept America safer. North Korea tested its first atomic weapon on President George W. Bush's watch. America was told we would be welcomed as liberators when we invaded Iraq but it never happened and 13 years after the invasion Iraq is still destabilized. President Reagan traded arms for hostages with Iran after his tough talk of never to negotiate with terrorists.
Now comes Donald Trump, the news media's favorite Presidential candidate, especially cable news with his tough talk. Instead of talking about the threat of spreading nuclear weapons he said he would urge South Korea and Japan to build their own nuclear capacity for self defense and that he would use nuclear weapons against ISIS in the middle east and that he would defeat them quickly. What do these republicans eat that make them try to talk tough only to fall flat on their face. Trumps policy of cutting taxes for Corporate America and the wealthy to spur the economy and create an unbelievable amount of jobs can be found in the library under "failed economic policy of republican administrations."
The America that the republicans try to paint with all their negative rhetoric is not the America I see or live in. America is still the greatest country in the world to live and breathe in and to raise a family. President Obama and the democratic controlled congress early on took the steps needed to bring the economy and jobs back after the worst recession since the great depression. It will now fall to the next President to take the next step with the economy to raise the wages of middle class workers that can be sustained and lasting. And the record shows democratic administrations accomplish that much better than republican administrations.
This commentary written by Joe Lorio
Note: See my previous 3 part commentary and conclusion titled, The U.S. Economy: Which Party Performs Best. Initial date 1/27/08
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)